Interphase cytogenetics of hematological cancer: comparison of classical karyotyping and in situ hybridization using a panel of eleven chromosome specific DNA probes
- PMID: 2004382
Interphase cytogenetics of hematological cancer: comparison of classical karyotyping and in situ hybridization using a panel of eleven chromosome specific DNA probes
Abstract
Numerical chromosome aberrations were detected in hematological cancers by nonradioactive in situ hybridization (ISH) procedures, using centromere specific probes for chromosomes 1, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 16, 17, 18, X, and Y. All 15 cases could be evaluated by ISH for these 11 probes. Our experiments show that in seven of these randomly selected leukemia bone marrow cell suspensions numerical aberrations for one or two chromosomes could be detected by this method. The results of ISH on interphase nuclei and in some cases on metaphase preparations were compared with karyotyping data. Seven cases of chromosomal aberrations observed with ISH (three for monosomy and four for trisomy) were confirmed by this classical cytogenetic technique, whereas in five instances an aberration was found only with ISH (twice for monosomy, twice for trisomy, and one disomy for the Y-probe). One case of a trisomy for chromosome 1 observed by ISH on interphase nuclei could be explained by a marker chromosome, a finding that was further substantiated by ISH on metaphase spreads. In this case double-target ISH on interphase cells with the probes for chromosomes 1 and 16 strongly suggested a translocation between these chromosomes. Also, in one case a marker chromosome could be characterized as a translocation between chromosomes 7 and 17. In this latter case the cytogenetic examinations revealed only monosomy for chromosomes 7 and 17 in addition to noncharacterized marker chromosomes. Our results indicate that the nonradioactive ISH procedure in combination with chromosome specific repetitive centromeric probes is a powerful tool for studying both numerical and structural chromosomal aberrations in interphase nuclei of leukemias. It may therefore become a valuable and routine diagnostic tool in addition to the existing karyotyping procedures.
Similar articles
-
[Cytogenetic study of 121 patients suffering from various hematologic neoplasms using the in situ hybridization technique].Sangre (Barc). 1996 Jun;41(3):201-9. Sangre (Barc). 1996. PMID: 8755208 Spanish.
-
DNA in situ hybridization (interphase cytogenetics) versus comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) in human cancer: detection of numerical and structural chromosome aberrations.Acta Histochem. 2000 Feb;102(1):85-94. doi: 10.1078/0065-1281-00540. Acta Histochem. 2000. PMID: 10726167
-
Interphase cytogenetics on agar cultures: a novel approach to determine chromosomal aberrations in hematopoietic progenitor cells.Exp Hematol. 1993 Jul;21(7):859-63. Exp Hematol. 1993. PMID: 8319778
-
Analytical approaches to detection and characterization of disease-linked chromosome aberrations.Bone Marrow Transplant. 1990 Jul;6 Suppl 1:14-9. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1990. PMID: 2202466 Review.
-
Diagnosis and monitoring of chromosome aberrations in hematological malignancies by fluorescence in situ hybridization.Stem Cells. 1995 Dec;13 Suppl 3:76-82. doi: 10.1002/stem.5530130712. Stem Cells. 1995. PMID: 8747992 Review.
Cited by
-
Rapid generation of chromosome-specific alphoid DNA probes using the polymerase chain reaction.Hum Genet. 1992 Feb;88(4):457-62. doi: 10.1007/BF00215682. Hum Genet. 1992. PMID: 1740323
-
Detection of genomic changes in cancer by in situ hybridization.Mol Biol Rep. 1994 Jan;19(1):31-44. doi: 10.1007/BF00987320. Mol Biol Rep. 1994. PMID: 7909582 Review. No abstract available.
-
Detection of minimal residual disease in leukaemia.Arch Dis Child. 1992 Jun;67(6):671-3. doi: 10.1136/adc.67.6.671. Arch Dis Child. 1992. PMID: 1626982 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Chromosome 1q21 abnormalities in multiple myeloma.Blood Cancer J. 2021 Apr 29;11(4):83. doi: 10.1038/s41408-021-00474-8. Blood Cancer J. 2021. PMID: 33927196 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Incidence of chromosome numerical changes in multiple myeloma: fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis using 15 chromosome-specific probes.Am J Pathol. 1996 Jul;149(1):153-61. Am J Pathol. 1996. PMID: 8686739 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical