Organization-wide adoption of computerized provider order entry systems: a study based on diffusion of innovations theory
- PMID: 20043843
- PMCID: PMC2809050
- DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-9-52
Organization-wide adoption of computerized provider order entry systems: a study based on diffusion of innovations theory
Abstract
Background: Computerized provider order entry (CPOE) systems have been introduced to reduce medication errors, increase safety, improve work-flow efficiency, and increase medical service quality at the moment of prescription. Making the impact of CPOE systems more observable may facilitate their adoption by users. We set out to examine factors associated with the adoption of a CPOE system for inter-organizational and intra-organizational care.
Methods: The diffusion of innovation theory was used to understand physicians' and nurses' attitudes and thoughts about implementation and use of the CPOE system. Two online survey questionnaires were distributed to all physicians and nurses using a CPOE system in county-wide healthcare organizations. The number of complete questionnaires analyzed was 134 from 200 nurses (67.0%) and 176 from 741 physicians (23.8%). Data were analyzed using descriptive-analytical statistical methods.
Results: More nurses (56.7%) than physicians (31.3%) stated that the CPOE system introduction had worked well in their clinical setting (P < 0.001). Similarly, more physicians (73.9%) than nurses (50.7%) reported that they found the system not adapted to their specific professional practice (P = < 0.001). Also more physicians (25.0%) than nurses (13.4%) stated that they did want to return to the previous system (P = 0.041). We found that in particular the received relative advantages of the CPOE system were estimated to be significantly (P < 0.001) higher among nurses (39.6%) than physicians (16.5%). However, physicians' agreements with the compatibility of the CPOE and with its complexity were significantly higher than the nurses (P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Qualifications for CPOE adoption as defined by three attributes of diffusion of innovation theory were not satisfied in the study setting. CPOE systems are introduced as a response to the present limitations in paper-based systems. In consequence, user expectations are often high on their relative advantages as well as on a low level of complexity. Building CPOE systems therefore requires designs that can provide rather important additional advantages, e.g. by preventing prescription errors and ultimately improving patient safety and safety of clinical work. The decision-making process leading to the implementation and use of CPOE systems in healthcare therefore has to be improved. As any change in health service settings usually faces resistance, we emphasize that CPOE system designers and healthcare decision-makers should continually collect users' feedback about the systems, while not forgetting that it also is necessary to inform the users about the potential benefits involved.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Determinant of successful implementation of Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) system from physicians' perspective: Feasibility study prior to implementation.Electron Physician. 2018 Jan 25;10(1):6201-6207. doi: 10.19082/6201. eCollection 2018 Jan. Electron Physician. 2018. PMID: 29588820 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of a computerized physician order entry system on nurse-physician collaboration in the medication process.Int J Med Inform. 2008 Nov;77(11):735-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.04.001. Epub 2008 Jun 2. Int J Med Inform. 2008. PMID: 18514020
-
Changes in end-user satisfaction with Computerized Provider Order Entry over time among nurses and providers in intensive care units.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Mar-Apr;20(2):252-9. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001114. Epub 2012 Oct 25. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013. PMID: 23100129 Free PMC article.
-
CPOE system design aspects and their qualitative effect on usability.Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;136:309-14. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008. PMID: 18487749 Review.
-
Computerized provider order entry: strategies for successful implementation.J Nurs Adm. 2006 Mar;36(3):136-9. doi: 10.1097/00005110-200603000-00007. J Nurs Adm. 2006. PMID: 16601516 Review.
Cited by
-
Differentiating innovation priorities among stakeholder in hospital care.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Aug 16;13:91. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-91. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013. PMID: 23947398 Free PMC article.
-
Culture change practice in U.S. Nursing homes: prevalence and variation by state medicaid reimbursement policies.Gerontologist. 2014 Jun;54(3):434-45. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnt020. Epub 2013 Mar 20. Gerontologist. 2014. PMID: 23514674 Free PMC article.
-
Risk analysis and user satisfaction after implementation of computerized physician order entry in Dutch hospitals.Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Apr;35(2):195-201. doi: 10.1007/s11096-012-9727-y. Epub 2012 Nov 28. Int J Clin Pharm. 2013. PMID: 23187963
-
Does Computerized Physician Order Entry Benefit from Dynamic Structured Data Entry? A Quasi-Experimental Study.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Nov 26;18(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0709-4. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018. PMID: 30477491 Free PMC article.
-
Pharmacists' views on integrated electronic prescribing systems: associations between usefulness, pharmacological safety, and barriers to technology use.Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Feb;67(2):179-84. doi: 10.1007/s00228-010-0936-9. Epub 2010 Nov 11. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011. PMID: 21069521
References
-
- Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, editors. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington DC: Institute of Medicine report. National Academies Press; 1999. - PubMed
-
- Bates DW, Kuperman G, Teich JM. Computerized physician order entry and quality of care. Qual Manag Health Care. 1994;2(4):18–27. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials