Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Apr;114(2):217-25.
doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfp308. Epub 2009 Dec 31.

Differential gene regulation by the human and mouse aryl hydrocarbon receptor

Affiliations

Differential gene regulation by the human and mouse aryl hydrocarbon receptor

Colin A Flaveny et al. Toxicol Sci. 2010 Apr.

Abstract

The human aryl hydrocarbon receptor (hAHR) and mouse aryl hydrocarbon receptor (mAHR(b)) share limited (58%) transactivation domain (TAD) sequence identity. Compared to the mAHR(b) allele, the hAHR displays 10-fold lower relative affinity for prototypical ligands, such as 2,3,7,8 tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). However, in previous studies, we have demonstrated that the hAHR can display a higher relative ligand-binding affinity than the mAHR(b) for specific AHR ligands, such as indirubin. Each receptor has also been shown to differentially recruit LXXLL coactivator motif proteins and to utilize different TAD subdomains in gene transactivation. Using hepatocytes isolated from C57BL/6J mice (Ahr(b/b)) and AHR(Ttr) transgenic mice, which express hAHR protein specifically in hepatocytes, we investigated whether the hAHR and mAHR(b) differentially regulate genes. DNA microarray and quantitative PCR analysis of Ahr(b/b) and AHR(Ttr) primary mouse hepatocytes treated with 10nM TCDD revealed that a number of established AHR target genes such as Cyp1a1 and Cyp1b1 are significantly induced by both receptors. Remarkably, of the 1752 genes induced by mAHR(b) and 1186 genes induced by hAHR, only 265 genes (approximately 18%) were significantly activated by both receptors in response to TCDD. Conversely, of the 1100 and 779 genes significantly repressed in mAHR(b) and hAHR hepatocytes, respectively, only 462 (approximately 49%) genes were significantly repressed by both receptors in response to TCDD treatment. Genes identified as differentially expressed are known to be involved in a number of biological pathways, including cell proliferation and inflammatory response, which suggest that compared to the mAHR(b), the hAHR may play contrasting roles in TCDD-induced toxicity and endogenous AHR-mediated gene regulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
AHRTtr mice express functional hAHR protein that is inducible with TCDD treatment. (A) Western blot using anti-AHR and control β-actin antibodies of total protein isolated from AHRTtr, Ahrfx/fx, Ahrfx/fx/CreAlb, and Ahrb/b primary mouse hepatocytes. (B) Real-time RT-PCR: mRNA from whole livers of TCDD-treated (n = 3) AHRTtr, Ahrfx/fx, and Ahrfx/fx/CreAlb mice were subjected to RT-PCR using primers for Cyp1a1, Cyp1b1, and Cyp1a2. Mice were treated with 100 μg/kg TCDD or vehicle for 6 h via ip injection. (C) Real-time RT-PCR of Cyp1a1 mRNA expression in TCDD-treated primary hepatocytes isolated from AHRTtr, Ahrb/b, and Ahrfx/fx/CreAlb mice. Primary hepatocytes isolated from AHRTtr, Ahrb/b, and Ahrfx/fx/CreAlb mice were treated with 10nM TCDD for 6 h. Total RNA, isolated from liver and hepatocytes, was converted to cDNA, and gene expression was quantified using real-time RT-PCR and primers for Cyp1a1, Cyp1a2, and Cyp1b1 (Supplementary table 1). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Number of genes induced or repressed in hepatocytes isolated from hAHR- and mAHR-expressing mouse primary hepatocytes in response to 10nM TCDD treatment for 6 h. DNA microarray data were normalized using the Probe Logarithmic Intensity Error (PLIER-MM) algorithm. Normalized DNA microarray data outputs from TCDD- and control-treated Ahrb/band AHRTtr hepatocytes were compared for differential expression using SAM (Pan, 2002; Tusher et al., 2001) with 100 permutations, KNN-10. The total number of genes induced and repressed by the hAHR or mAHRb in response to TCDD was then calculated from the SAM output gene lists and plotted graphically.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
Functional annotation cluster analysis of the genes that are differentially induced or repressed by the mAHR and hAHR. hAHR and mAHRb signal: Probe Logarithmic Intensity Error (PLIER-MM) normalized signal for TCDD-induced samples. Change fold induction: relative PLIER-MM normalized signals for TCDD-treated mAHRb and hAHR samples. Gene clusters of differentially regulated genes were generated using DAVID Functional Annotation Clustering Tool (Dennis et al., 2003; Huang da et al., 2009). The number of genes for each functional cluster differentially regulated by each receptor was then calculated from the gene cluster lists and represented graphically.
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.
Real-time RT-PCR of differentially expressed genes in primary hepatocytes derived from AHRTtr, Ahrfx/fx, and Ahrfx/fx/CreAlb mice. (A) Adi1 and Oxtr mRNA expression assessed using the cognate primers (Supplementary table 1) and total RNA isolated from AHRTtr, Ahrfx/fx, and Ahrfx/fx/CreAlb mice. (B) Real-time RT-PCR: Egf and Gsn mRNA expression was assayed using RNA isolated from AHRTtr, Ahrfx/fx, and Ahrfx/fx/CreAlb mice. (A–B) Primary hepatocytes isolated from AHRTtr, Ahrb/b, and Ahrfx/fx/CreAlb mice were treated with 10nM TCDD or DMSO vehicle control for 6 h. All experiments were repeated three times. Total RNA samples were generated in triplicate, with samples represented by the three genotypes (AHRTtr, Ahrfx/fx, and Ahrfx/fx/CreAlb) originating from hepatocytes isolated from one mouse each. RNA samples were generated using a new batch of control- and TCDD-treated hepatocytes that were generated independently of the hepatocytes RNA samples subjected to microarray analysis. For all experiments, total RNA, isolated from hepatocytes, was converted to cDNA and gene expression was quantified using the cognate primers (Supplementary table 1). Real-time RT-PCR data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni posttests, and p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Birnbaum LS. Evidence of the role of the Ah receptor in responses to dioxin. Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 1994;387:139–154. - PubMed
    1. Carlson EA, McCulloch C, Koganti A, Goodwin SB, Sutter TR, Silkworth JB. Divergent transcriptomic responses to aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonists between rat and human primary hepatocytes. Toxicol. Sci. 2009;112:257–272. - PubMed
    1. Cheung C, Akiyama TE, Ward JM, Nicol CJ, Feigenbaum L, Vinson C, Gonzalez FJ. Diminished hepatocellular proliferation in mice humanized for the nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha. Cancer Res. 2004;64:3849–3854. - PubMed
    1. Ciolino HP, Daschner PJ, Yeh GC. Dietary flavonols quercetin and kaempferol are ligands of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor that affect CYP1A1 transcription differentially. Biochem. J. 1999;340(Pt 3):715–722. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cui J, Heard TS, Yu J, Lo JL, Huang L, Li Y, Schaeffer JM, Wright SD. The amino acid residues asparagine 354 and isoleucine 372 of human farnesoid X receptor confer the receptor with high sensitivity to chenodeoxycholate. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:25963–25969. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances