Articular surface replacement of the hip: a prospective single-surgeon series
- PMID: 20044675
- DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B1.22769
Articular surface replacement of the hip: a prospective single-surgeon series
Abstract
We present the early clinical and radiological results of Articular Surface Replacement (ASR) resurfacings in 214 hips (192 patients) with a mean follow-up of 43 months (30 to 57). The mean age of the patients was 56 years (28 to 74) and 85 hips (40%) were in 78 women. The mean Harris hip score improved from 52 (11 to 81) to 95 (27 to 100) at two years and the mean University of California, Los Angeles activity score from 3.9 (1 to 10) to 7.4 (2 to 10) in the same period. Narrowing of the neck (to a maximum of 9%) was noted in 124 of 209 hips (60%). There were 12 revisions (5.6%) involving four (1.9%) early fractures of the femoral neck and two (0.9%) episodes of collapse of the femoral head secondary to avascular necrosis. Six patients (2.8%) had failure related to metal wear debris. The overall survival for our series was 93% (95% confidence interval 80 to 98) and 89% (95% confidence interval 82 to 96) for hips with acetabular components smaller than 56 mm in diameter. The ASR implant has a lower diametrical clearance and a subhemispherical acetabular component when compared with other more frequently implanted metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. These changes may contribute to the higher failure rate than in other series, compared with other designs. Given our poor results with the small components we are no longer implanting the smaller size.
Similar articles
-
Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing.J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 May;88(5):592-600. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B5.17354. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006. PMID: 16645103
-
Femoral component neck fracture after failed hip resurfacing arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty. 2011 Dec;26(8):1570.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.11.017. Epub 2011 Mar 11. J Arthroplasty. 2011. PMID: 21397452
-
[Complications after hip resurfacing using the ASR prosthesis in patients with osteoarthritis].Z Orthop Unfall. 2008 Mar-Apr;146(2):179-84. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1038397. Z Orthop Unfall. 2008. PMID: 18404580 German.
-
Metal-on-metal surface replacement: a triumph of hope over reason: affirms.Orthopedics. 2011 Sep 9;34(9):e439-41. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20110714-21. Orthopedics. 2011. PMID: 21902124 Review.
-
The role of total hip replacement in the treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures in the elderly.Injury. 2012 Oct;43(10):1621-2. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.07.189. Epub 2012 Jul 31. Injury. 2012. PMID: 22857872 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Pseudotumors are common in well-positioned low-wearing metal-on-metal hips.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jul;470(7):1895-906. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2201-7. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012. PMID: 22179978 Free PMC article.
-
Do Complication Rates Differ by Gender After Metal-on-metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Aug;473(8):2521-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4227-8. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015. PMID: 25758375 Free PMC article.
-
The Correlation of Serum Metal Ions with Functional Outcome Scores at Three-to-Six Years following Large Head Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty.ISRN Orthop. 2013 Mar 27;2013:173923. doi: 10.1155/2013/173923. eCollection 2013. ISRN Orthop. 2013. PMID: 24959353 Free PMC article.
-
Indications and results of hip resurfacing.Int Orthop. 2011 Feb;35(2):231-7. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1148-8. Epub 2010 Nov 16. Int Orthop. 2011. PMID: 21079954 Free PMC article.
-
Socket position determines hip resurfacing 10-year survivorship.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Nov;470(11):3127-33. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2347-y. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012. PMID: 22528380 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical