Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of "micro" bond strength test methods
- PMID: 20045179
- DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.155
Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of "micro" bond strength test methods
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to critically review the literature regarding the mechanics, geometry, load application and other testing parameters of "micro" shear and tensile adhesion tests, and to outline their advantages and limitations. The testing of multiple specimens from a single tooth conserves teeth and allows research designs not possible using conventional 'macro' methods. Specimen fabrication, gripping and load application methods, in addition to material properties of the various components comprising the resin-tooth adhesive bond, will influence the stress distribution and consequently, the nominal bond strength and failure mode. These issues must be understood; as should the limitations inherent to strength-based testing of a complicated adhesive bond joining dissimilar substrates, for proper test selection, conduct and interpretation. Finite element analysis and comprehensive reporting of test conduct and results will further our efforts towards a standardization of test procedures. For the foreseeable future, both "micro" and "macro" bond strength tests will, as well as various morphological and spectroscopic investigative techniques, continue to be important tools for improving resin-tooth adhesion to increase the service life of dental resin-based composite restorations.
Copyright 2009 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of "macro" test methods.Dent Mater. 2010 Feb;26(2):e38-49. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.150. Epub 2009 Dec 11. Dent Mater. 2010. PMID: 20004960 Review.
-
Direct comparison of the bond strength results of the different test methods: a critical literature review.Dent Mater. 2010 Feb;26(2):e78-93. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.12.002. Epub 2010 Jan 8. Dent Mater. 2010. PMID: 20060160 Review.
-
Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Feb;99(2):131-40. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60029-3. J Prosthet Dent. 2008. PMID: 18262014
-
Shear versus micro-shear bond strength test: a finite element stress analysis.Dent Mater. 2007 Sep;23(9):1086-92. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.10.002. Epub 2006 Nov 22. Dent Mater. 2007. PMID: 17123595
-
Review of the fracture toughness approach.Dent Mater. 2010 Feb;26(2):e63-77. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.151. Epub 2009 Dec 31. Dent Mater. 2010. PMID: 20045178 Review.
Cited by
-
Fatigue of the resin-enamel bonded interface and the mechanisms of failure.J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013 May;21:121-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.02.017. Epub 2013 Mar 1. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013. PMID: 23571321 Free PMC article.
-
Development of Proanthocyanidin-Loaded Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for Improving Dental Adhesion.Mol Pharm. 2022 Dec 5;19(12):4675-4684. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.2c00728. Epub 2022 Nov 9. Mol Pharm. 2022. PMID: 36349888 Free PMC article.
-
The improvement of biocompatibility of adhesives : The effects of resveratrol on biocompatibility and dentin micro-tensile bond strengths of self-etch adhesives.Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Aug;23(8):3213-3218. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2745-y. Epub 2018 Nov 10. Clin Oral Investig. 2019. PMID: 30415440
-
Bond Strength of Reline Materials to 3D-Printed Provisional Crown Resins.Polymers (Basel). 2023 Sep 13;15(18):3745. doi: 10.3390/polym15183745. Polymers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37765598 Free PMC article.
-
Validity of bond strength tests: A critical review-Part II.J Conserv Dent. 2014 Sep;17(5):420-6. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.139823. J Conserv Dent. 2014. PMID: 25298640 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources