A long-term treatment outcome of abdominal sacrocolpopexy
- PMID: 20046422
- PMCID: PMC2796408
- DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2009.50.6.807
A long-term treatment outcome of abdominal sacrocolpopexy
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term treatment outcome and major complication rates of abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC).
Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 57 Korean women who underwent ASC with mesh for symptomatic uterine or vault prolapse and attended follow-up visits for at least 5 years. Forty-seven women with urodynamic stress incontinence concomitantly received a modified Burch colposuspension. The long-term anatomical and functional outcomes and complication rates were assessed.
Results: The median follow-up was 66 months (range 60-108). Overall anatomical success rates (no recurrence of any prolapse >or= stage II according to the pelvic organ prolapse-quantification system) were 86.0%. Urinary urgency and voiding dysfunction were significantly improved after surgery, however, recurrent stress urinary incontinence developed in 44.7% (21/47) of cases and half of them developed within 1-3 months post-op. Bowel function (constipation and fecal incontinence) and sexual function (sexual activity and dyspareunia) did not significantly change after surgery. Major complication requiring reoperation or intensive care developed in 12 (21.0%) cases.
Conclusions: ASC provides durable pelvic support, however, it may be ineffective for alleviating pelvic floor dysfunction except for urinary urgency and voiding dysfunction, and it contains major complication risk that cannot be overlooked.
Keywords: Abdominal sacrocolpopexy; prolapse; treatment outcome.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Sacrocolpopexy for posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: long-term follow-up.Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Oct;27(10):1563-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-2998-4. Epub 2016 Mar 18. Int Urogynecol J. 2016. PMID: 26992724
-
Guideline No. 413: Surgical Management of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2021 Apr;43(4):511-523.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2021.02.001. Epub 2021 Feb 3. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2021. PMID: 33548503
-
Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.JAMA. 2013 May 15;309(19):2016-24. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.4919. JAMA. 2013. PMID: 23677313 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Sexual function after pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review comparing different approaches to pelvic floor repair.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Nov;225(5):475.e1-475.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.042. Epub 2021 Jun 2. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 34087227
-
Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: a short version Cochrane review.Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27(1):3-12. doi: 10.1002/nau.20542. Neurourol Urodyn. 2008. PMID: 18092333 Review.
Cited by
-
Mesh complications and failure rates after transvaginal mesh repair compared with abdominal or laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and to native tissue repair in treating apical prolapse.Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Feb;28(2):215-222. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3108-3. Epub 2016 Aug 25. Int Urogynecol J. 2017. PMID: 27562466
-
Current trends and future perspectives in pelvic reconstructive surgery.Womens Health (Lond). 2018 Jan-Dec;14:1745506518776498. doi: 10.1177/1745506518776498. Womens Health (Lond). 2018. PMID: 29772955 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Quality of life assessment in women after cervicosacropexy with polypropylene mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: a preliminary study.Prz Menopauzalny. 2015 Jun;14(2):126-9. doi: 10.5114/pm.2015.52153. Epub 2015 Jun 22. Prz Menopauzalny. 2015. PMID: 26327900 Free PMC article.
-
Sacrocolpopexy for posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: long-term follow-up.Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Oct;27(10):1563-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-2998-4. Epub 2016 Mar 18. Int Urogynecol J. 2016. PMID: 26992724
-
Risk factors for vaginal mesh erosion after sacrocolpopexy in Korean women.PLoS One. 2020 Feb 10;15(2):e0228566. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228566. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32040517 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A. Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women's Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:1160–1166. - PubMed
-
- Marchionni M, Bracco GL, Checcucci V, Carabaneanu A, Coccia EM, Mecacci F, et al. True incidence of vaginal vault prolapse. Thirteen years of experience. J Reprod Med. 1999;44:679–684. - PubMed
-
- Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, Connolly A, Cundiff G, Weber AM, et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:805–823. - PubMed
-
- Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:116–126. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous