Long-Term clinical outcomes according to initial management and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk score in patients with acute non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
- PMID: 20046515
- PMCID: PMC2799982
- DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2010.51.1.58
Long-Term clinical outcomes according to initial management and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk score in patients with acute non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
Erratum in
- Yonsei Med J. 2010 May;51(3):478
Abstract
Purpose: There is still debate about the timing of revascularization in patients with acute non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). We analyzed the long-term clinical outcomes of the timing of revascularization in patients with acute NSTEMI obtained from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR).
Materials and methods: 2,845 patients with acute NSTEMI (65.6 +/- 12.5 years, 1,836 males) who were enrolled in KAMIR were included in the present study. The therapeutic strategy of NSTEMI was categorized into early invasive (within 48 hours, 65.8 +/- 12.6 years, 856 males) and late invasive treatment (65.3 +/- 12.1 years, 979 males). The initial- and long-term clinical outcomes were compared between two groups according to the level of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score.
Results: There were significant differences in-hospital mortality and the incidence of major adverse cardiac events during one-year clinical follow-up between two groups (2.1% vs. 4.8%, p < 0.001, 10.0% vs. 13.5%, p = 0.004, respectively). According to the TIMI risk score, there was no significant difference of long-term clinical outcomes in patients with low to moderate TIMI risk score, but significant difference in patients with high TIMI risk score (>or= 5 points).
Conclusions: The old age, high Killip class, low ejection fraction, high TIMI risk score, and late invasive treatment strategy are the independent predictors for the long-term clinical outcomes in patients with NSTEMI.
Keywords: Myocardial infarction; TIMI risk score; invasive treatment; non-ST-segment elevation; prognosis.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Improved in-hospital outcomes in acute coronary syndromes (unstable angina/non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction) despite similar TIMI risk scores.J Invasive Cardiol. 2003 Sep;15(9):502-6. J Invasive Cardiol. 2003. PMID: 12947210
-
Use of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk score to predict bleeding complications in patients with unstable angina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2013 Jul;28(3):242-9. doi: 10.1007/s12928-013-0162-3. Epub 2013 Jan 30. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2013. PMID: 23361950 Clinical Trial.
-
Early- and late-term clinical outcome and their predictors in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Int J Cardiol. 2013 Nov 15;169(4):254-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.08.132. Epub 2013 Sep 8. Int J Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 24071385
-
Contemporary NSTEMI management: the role of the hospitalist.Hosp Pract (1995). 2020 Feb;48(1):1-11. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2020.1701329. Epub 2020 Feb 20. Hosp Pract (1995). 2020. PMID: 31815570 Review.
-
The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk score in unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Feb 19;41(4 Suppl S):89S-95S. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)03019-x. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003. PMID: 12644346 Review.
Cited by
-
New horizons of acute myocardial infarction: from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry.J Korean Med Sci. 2013 Feb;28(2):173-80. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2013.28.2.173. Epub 2013 Jan 29. J Korean Med Sci. 2013. PMID: 23399991 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Gender-based differences in the management and prognosis of acute coronary syndrome in Korea.Yonsei Med J. 2011 Jul;52(4):562-8. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2011.52.4.562. Yonsei Med J. 2011. PMID: 21623596 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term prognosis of patients with acute non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing different treatment strategies.Chin Med J (Engl). 2015 Apr 20;128(8):1026-31. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.155071. Chin Med J (Engl). 2015. PMID: 25881594 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bassand JP, Hamm CW, Ardissino D, Boersma E, Budaj A, Fernández-Avilés F, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:1598–1660. - PubMed
-
- Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW, Califf RM, Cheitlin MD, Hochman JS, et al. ACC/AHA guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction 2002: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients with Unstable Angina) Circulation. 2002;106:1893–1900. - PubMed
-
- King SB, 3rd, Smith SC, Jr, Hirshfeld JW, Jr, Jacobs AK, Morrison DA, Williams DO, et al. 2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA/ SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2008;117:261–295. - PubMed
-
- Pollack CV, Jr, Braunwald E. 2007 Update to the ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: implications for emergency department practice. Ann Emerg Med. 2008;51:591–606. - PubMed
-
- de Winter RJ, Windhausen F, Cornel JH, Dunselman PH, Janus CL, Bendermacher PE, et al. Early invasive versus selectively invasive management for acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1095–1104. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical