Applying Joint Mobilization at Different Cervical Vertebral Levels does not Influence Immediate Pain Reduction in Patients with Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- PMID: 20046551
- PMCID: PMC2700500
- DOI: 10.1179/106698109790824686
Applying Joint Mobilization at Different Cervical Vertebral Levels does not Influence Immediate Pain Reduction in Patients with Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of applying joint mobilization at symptomatic and asymptomatic cervical levels in patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain. Forty-eight patients aged between 18 and 65 years and presenting nonspecific neck pain with a minimum duration of 3 months were recruited for the study. Included patients were randomized to one of two treatment groups: (i) control group: the most symptomatic vertebral level was mobilized; (ii) experimental group: a randomly selected vertebral level was chosen and mobilized. All patients received one treatment session. Pain intensity in resting position during the most painful active cervical movement as well as during vertebral palpation was quantified using an 11-point pain scale. Follow-up measures were taken immediately after intervention by a blinded assessor. The results showed no significant difference in pain intensity immediately after treatment between groups (symptomatic level treated vs. randomly chosen cervical vertebral level treated) during resting position, painful active movement, or vertebral palpation. Within-group comparisons showed significant pain relief after treatment during the most painful active movement as well as during vertebral palpation for both groups, but not during resting position. Significant change in immediate pain intensity during painful active movement and vertebral palpation was achieved after vertebral mobilization. however, both groups presented similar pain reductions suggesting that pain reduction due to joint mobilization is not specific to the vertebral level being mobilized.
Keywords: Manual Therapy; Mobilization; Neck Pain; Randomized Clinical Trial.
Similar articles
-
Immediate effects of the central posteroanterior mobilization technique on pain and range of motion in patients with mechanical neck pain.Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(8):622-8. doi: 10.3109/09638280903204716. Disabil Rehabil. 2010. PMID: 20205574 Clinical Trial.
-
The immediate effects of mobilization technique on pain and range of motion in patients presenting with unilateral neck pain: a randomized controlled trial.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Feb;90(2):187-92. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.07.017. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009. PMID: 19236972 Clinical Trial.
-
The effect of an analgesic mobilization technique when applied at symptomatic or asymptomatic levels of the cervical spine in subjects with neck pain: a randomized controlled trial.J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(2):101-8. doi: 10.1179/106698109790824758. J Man Manip Ther. 2009. PMID: 20046552 Free PMC article.
-
Immediate effects of thoracic spine self-mobilization in patients with mechanical neck pain: A randomized controlled trial.J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2019 Apr;23(2):417-424. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2018.05.008. Epub 2018 Jun 1. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2019. PMID: 31103129 Clinical Trial.
-
The immediate effect of manipulation versus mobilization on pain and range of motion in the cervical spine: a randomized controlled trial.J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992 Nov-Dec;15(9):570-5. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992. PMID: 1469341 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Manipulation and Mobilization for Treating Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis for an Appropriateness Panel.Pain Physician. 2019 Mar;22(2):E55-E70. Pain Physician. 2019. PMID: 30921975 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of central and unilateral posteroanterior mobilization on cervical lordosis, muscle stiffness and ROM in patient with ankylosing spondylitis: case study.J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Jul;29(7):1276-1280. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.1276. Epub 2017 Jul 15. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017. PMID: 28744064 Free PMC article.
-
Chronic neck pain: making the connection between capsular ligament laxity and cervical instability.Open Orthop J. 2014 Oct 1;8:326-45. doi: 10.2174/1874325001408010326. eCollection 2014. Open Orthop J. 2014. PMID: 25328557 Free PMC article.
-
The efficacy of manual therapy and exercise for treating non-specific neck pain: A systematic review.J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2017 Nov 6;30(6):1149-1169. doi: 10.3233/BMR-169615. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2017. PMID: 28826164 Free PMC article.
-
The relative effectiveness of segment specific level and non-specific level spinal joint mobilization on pain and range of motion: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Man Manip Ther. 2013 Feb;21(1):7-17. doi: 10.1179/2042618612Y.0000000016. J Man Manip Ther. 2013. PMID: 24421608 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Maitland G, Hengeveld E, Banks K, English K. Maitland's Vertebral Manipulation. 6th ed. Woburn, MA: Butterworth Heinemann; 2001.
-
- Bronfort G, Haas M, Evans R, Bouter L. Efficacy of spinal manipulation and mobilization for low back pain and neck pain: A systematic review and best evidence synthesis. Spine J. 2004;4:335–356. - PubMed
-
- Childs J, Fritz J, Flynn T, et al. A clinical prediction rule to identify patients with low back pain most likely to benefit from spinal manipulation: A validation study. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:920–930. - PubMed
-
- Hoving J, Koes B, de Vet H, et al. Manual therapy, physical therapy, or continued care by a general practitioner for patients with neck pain. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:713–722. - PubMed
-
- Hurwitz E, Acker P, Adams A, Meeker W, Shekelle P. Manipulation and mobilization of the cervical spine: A systematic review of the literature. Spine. 1996;21:1746–1759. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical