Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009;17(2):101-8.
doi: 10.1179/106698109790824758.

The effect of an analgesic mobilization technique when applied at symptomatic or asymptomatic levels of the cervical spine in subjects with neck pain: a randomized controlled trial

Jochen Schomacher  1
Affiliations

The effect of an analgesic mobilization technique when applied at symptomatic or asymptomatic levels of the cervical spine in subjects with neck pain: a randomized controlled trial

Jochen Schomacher. J Man Manip Ther. 2009.

Abstract

The purpose of this single-blinded, randomized controlled trial was to compare the effects of a manual treatment technique on neck pain and movement sensation when applied in different segments of the cervical spine. Consecutive patients with neck pain (n=126) were recruited and randomly allocated to two groups (A or B). Group A received a single 4-minute pain-alleviating traction at the most symptomatic zygopophyseal joint of the cervical segment, where movement was correlated with pain. Group B received the same treatment 3 segments away from the concordant segment. Pain intensity and sensation of movement were assessed with a numeric rating scale (NRS). Statistical analysis included a t-test for paired and unpaired samples. Pre- and post-test findings demonstrated significant improvements in both types of mobilization although there was no significant difference between the two groups. Similar results have been reported in the literature for cervical manipulation. The findings of this study question the necessity of precise symptom localization tests for a pain treatment. however, limitations of the study prevent generalization of these results.

Keywords: Mobilization; Randomized Controlled Trial; Specificity of Treatment; Symptom Localization Tests; Traction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Schematic representation of symptom localization tests with movements
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Examples of symptom localization tests when extension of the neck was the painful movement
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
The treatment procedure used in the study: traction of the zygoapophyseal joint
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Study flowchart
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Freburger JK, Carey TS, Holmes GM. Management of back and neck pain: Who seeks care from physical therapists? Phys Ther. 2005;85:868–872. - PubMed
    1. Kaltenborn FM. Manuelle Therapie nach Kaltenborn, Untersuchung und Behandlung, Teil I – Extremitäten. 12th ed. Oslo, Norway: Norlis; 2005.
    1. Kaltenborn FM. Manual Mobilization of the Joints. Volume II: The Spine. 4th ed. Oslo, Norway: Norlis; 2003.
    1. Chiradejnant A, Latimer J, Maher CG, Stepkovitch N. Does the choice of spinal level treated during posteroanterior (PA) mobilisation affect treatment outcome? Physiother Theory Pract. 2002;18:165–174.
    1. Schomacher J. Physiotherapeutische Tests zur Symptomlokalisation im HWS-Bereich, Teil 1. Manuelle Therapie. 2006;10:60a–68a.

LinkOut - more resources