Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009;17(2):109-17.
doi: 10.1179/106698109790824730.

Interrater reliability of a new classification system for patients with neural low back-related leg pain

Interrater reliability of a new classification system for patients with neural low back-related leg pain

Axel Schäfer et al. J Man Manip Ther. 2009.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability of a new classification system for low back-related leg pain arising from neural tissue dysfunction. Leg pain is a frequent accompaniment to back pain and is an indicator of the severity and prognosis of the disorder. For optimal patient care, treatment should be directed according to the identified pathophysiological mechanisms. The authors have proposed a sub-classification of neural low back-related leg pain into four categories, each requiring a different management strategy: Central Sensitization (CS), comprising major features of sensitization of the somatosensory system; Denervation (D), arising from significant axonal compromise without evidence of major central nervous system changes; Peripheral Nerve Sensitization (PNS), arising from nerve trunk inflammation without clinical evidence of significant denervation; and Musculoskeletal pain (M), referred from non-neural structures such as the disc or facet joints. The purpose of this study was to investigate the interrater reliability of this classification system. Forty consecutive patients with unilateral low back-related leg pain were independently assessed by five pairs of examiners using a physical examination protocol, screening for central sensitization of the somatosensory system, neurological deficit, and nerve tissue mechano-sensitization. Subjects were classified as follows: CS 30%, D 27.5%, PNS 10%, and M 32.5%. Interrater reliability was good with 80% agreement and a k of 0.72 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) .57-.86). The findings of the study demonstrate that patients with low back-related leg pain can be reliably classified to one of the four proposed groups.

Keywords: Classification; Interrater Reliability; Leg Pain; Low Back Pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Classification algorithm ∗LANSS: Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Flow diagram

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Borkan JM, Koes B, Reis S, Cherkin DC. A report from the Second International Forum for Primary Care Research on Low Back Pain: Reexamining priorities. Spine. 1998;23:1992–1996. - PubMed
    1. Henschke N, Maher CG, Refshauge KM, Das A, McAuley JH. Low back pain research priorities: A survey of primary care practitioners. BMC Fam Prac. 2007;8:40. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van Boxem K, Van Zundert J, Van Zundert J, Patijn J, van Kleef M. Pseudoradicular and radicular low-back pain: How to diagnose clinically? Pain. 2008;135:311–312. author reply 313–315. - PubMed
    1. Leffler AS, Hansson P. Letter to the editor of Pain on Freynhagen et al: Pseudoradicular and radicular low-back pain: A disease continuum rather than different entities? Answers from quantitative sensory testing. Pain. 2007;135:65–74. - PubMed
    1. Cavanaugh JM, Weinstein JN. Low back pain: Epidemiology, anatomy and neurophysiology. In: Wall PD, Melzack R, editors. The Textbook of Pain. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1994.

LinkOut - more resources