Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009;17(3):154-62.
doi: 10.1179/jmt.2009.17.3.154.

Repeated Applications of Thoracic Spine Thrust Manipulation do not Lead to Tolerance in Patients Presenting with Acute Mechanical Neck Pain: A Secondary Analysis

Cesar Fernández-De-Las-Peñas, Joshua A Cleland, Peter Huijbregts, Luis Palomeque-Del-Cerro, Javier González-Iglesias

Repeated Applications of Thoracic Spine Thrust Manipulation do not Lead to Tolerance in Patients Presenting with Acute Mechanical Neck Pain: A Secondary Analysis

Cesar Fernández-De-Las-Peñas et al. J Man Manip Ther. 2009.

Abstract

It has been demonstrated that patients receiving mobilization techniques do not exhibit tolerance to repeated applications. However, this phenomenon has not been investigated for thoracic manipulation. Our aim was to determine if patients receiving thoracic thrust manipulation exhibit tolerance to repeated applications in acute mechanical neck pain. Forty-five patients were randomly assigned to two groups. The control group received electro- and thermotherapy for 5 sessions, and the experimental group received the same program and also received a thoracic thrust manipulation once a week for 3 consecutive weeks. Outcome measures included neck pain and cervical mobility. Within-session change scores for pain and mobility during treatment sessions #1, 3, and 5 were examined with a one-way repeated measured ANOVA. A 2-way ANOVA with session as within-subject variable and group as between-subject variable was used to compare change scores for each visit between groups to ascertain if there were significant between-group differences in within-session changes for the experimental versus the control group. The ANOVA showed that for either group the 3 within-session change scores were not significantly different (P > 0.1). The 2-way ANOVA revealed significant differences between groups for both pain and neck mobility in within-session change scores (all, P < 0.001). Change scores in each session were superior in the experimental group as compared to those in the control group. The results suggest that patients receiving thoracic manipulation do not exhibit tolerance to repeated applications with regard to pain and mobility measures in acute mechanical neck pain. Further studies should investigate the dose-response relationship of thoracic thrust manipulation in this population.

Keywords: Neck Pain; Thoracic Thrust Manipulation; Tolerance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Thoracic thrust manipulation.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Flow diagram of subjects throughout the course of the study.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Hogg-Johnson S, Van der Velde G, Carroll LJ, et al. The burden and determinants of neck pain in the general population. Spine. 2008;33:S39–S51. - PubMed
    1. Côté P, Cassidy J, Carroll L. The factors associated with neck pain and its related disability in the Saskatchewan population. Spine. 2000;25:1109–1117. - PubMed
    1. Nygren A, Berglund A, von Koch M. Neckand-shoulder pain, an increasing problem: Strategies for using insurance material to follow trends. - PubMed
    1. Borghouts JA, Koes BW, Bouter LM. The clinical course and prognostic factors of non-specific neck pain: A systematic review. Pain. 1998;77:1–13. - PubMed
    1. Gore DR, Sepic SB, Gardner GM, et al. Neck pain: A long-term follow-up of 205 patients. Spine. 1987;12:1–5. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources