Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jan;12(1):29-33.
doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2009.00196.x.

Treatment of hypertension in the inpatient setting: use of intravenous labetalol and hydralazine

Affiliations

Treatment of hypertension in the inpatient setting: use of intravenous labetalol and hydralazine

Alan B Weder et al. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2010 Jan.

Abstract

Acute blood pressure elevations are commonly treated in hospitalized patients. There are no guidelines for appropriate practice and no evidence that such treatment is useful. The authors performed a retrospective review of medical and pharmacy records to determine how often intravenous hydralazine and labetalol are ordered and administered. During a 1-year study period, a total of 29,545 hospitalizations were recorded. The authors identified 2189 patients (7.4% of all patients) for whom 7242 orders were written for hydralazine as needed (10-20 mg per dose) and 5915 for labetalol (10-20 mg per dose). Ordered drugs were administered in 60.3% of patients, and the average number of doses administered was 5.3+/-8.2 (mean +/- SD) for hydralazine and 5.6+/-7.7 for labetalol. Hospital length of stay (LOS) for patients for whom hydralazine was ordered was 12.0+/-15.9 days for those who received at least 1 dose and 7.1+/-9.0 days for those who did not receive a dose (P<.001). For patients for whom labetalol was ordered, patients receiving at least 1 dose had an LOS of 11.8+/-16.1 days vs 7.9+/-10.4 days for those who did not receive a dose (P<.001). Treatment of elevated blood pressure in in-patients is a common practice. The authors suggest that evidence is needed to determine whether the practice is of benefit.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Intravenous hydralazine and labetalol: pharmacy orders and drug administration in hospitalized patients.

References

    1. Cherney D, Straus S. Management of patients with hypertensive urgencies and emergencies. A systematic review of the literature. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17:937–945. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perez MI, Musini VM. Pharmacological interventions for hypertensive emergencies: a Cochrane systematic review. J Hum Hypertens. 2008;22:596–607. - PubMed
    1. Ishibashi Y, Shimada T, Yoshitomi H, et al. Sublingual nifedipine in elderly patients: even a low dose induces myocardial ischemia. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1999; 26:404–410. - PubMed
    1. Rubio‐Guerra AF, Vargas‐Ayala G, Lozano‐Nuevo JJ, et al. Comparison between isosorbide dinitrate aerosol and nifedipine in the treatment of hypertensive emergencies. J Hum Hypertens. 1999;13:473–476. - PubMed
    1. Hoside S, Eguchi K, Ishikawa J, et al. Can ischemic stroke be caused by acute reduction of blood pressure in the acute phase of cardiovascular disease? J Clin Hypertens. 2008;10:195–200. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types