Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Feb 12;365(1539):477-90.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0230.

Aquilegia as a model system for the evolution and ecology of petals

Elena M Kramer  1 , Scott A Hodges
Affiliations
Review

Aquilegia as a model system for the evolution and ecology of petals

Elena M Kramer et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

The ranunculid genus Aquilegia holds extraordinary promise as a model system for investigating a wide range of questions relating to the evolution and ecology of petals. New genetic and genomic resources, including an extensive EST database, BAC libraries and physical maps, as well as virus-induced gene silencing are facilitating this research on multiple fronts. At the developmental genetic level, Aquilegia has been important for elucidating the developmental programme for specifying petals and petaloid characteristics. Data suggest that duplication events among the petal and stamen identity genes have resulted in sub- and neofunctionalization. This expansion of gene function does not include the petaloidy of Aquilegia sepals, however, which does not depend on the same loci that control identity of the second whorl petals. Of special interest is the elaboration of the petal into a nectar spur, a major innovation for the genus. Intra- and interspecific variation in the shape and colour of petals, especially the spurs, has been shown to be adaptative for different pollinators. Thus, understanding the genetic basis of these traits will help us connect the ecological interactions driving speciation with the genetic changes responsible for remodelling morphology. Progress in this area has focused on the multiple, parallel transitions in flower colour and nectar spur length across the genus. For flower colour, upstream transcription factors appear to be primarily targets of natural selection. Thus research in Aquilegia spans the initial evolution of petals and petaloidy to the diversification of petal morphology to the ecological basis of petal form, thereby providing a comprehensive picture of the evolutionary biology of this critical angiosperm feature.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(a) The classic ABC model with the addition of the E function. (b) The corresponding ABCE genes from Arabidopsis. The A class genes APETALA1 (AP1) and APETALA2 (AP2) specify sepals (SEP) and with the B class genes, APETALA3 (AP3) and PISTALLATA (PI), specify petals (PET). The B class genes with the C class gene AGAMOUS (AG) specify stamens (STA) and the C class gene alone specifies carpels (CAR). (c,d) The modified ABC model of Aquilegia based on expression studies of the B gene homologues: (c) corresponds to early developmental stages while (d) reflects expression after carpel initiation.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Floral variation across natural species and one cultivar of Aquilegia. (a) A. caerulea. (b) A. shockleyi. (c) A. pubescens. (d) A. chrysantha. (e) A. caerulea var. daileyae, which lacks spurs. (f) A. vulgaris ‘Black Tower’, which has stamens transformed into petals. Photos: (a) Nathan Derieg; (b–e) Scott Hodges and (f) Elena Kramer.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Simplified phylogeny of the angiosperms based on Moore et al. (2007) showing the position of Aquilegia relative to other major model systems.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Frequency distribution of the length of tentative consensus (TC) sequences in the AqGI.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Classification of sequences from the AqGI to GO vocabularies. (a) Molecular function, (b) biological processes and (c) cellular component.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Comparison of individual petals among species of Aquilegia. (a) Aquilegia longissima, (b) Aquilegia pinetorum, (c) Aquilegia chrysantha, (d,e) A. formosa and (f) Aquilegia flabellata (scale bar, 1 cm).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Abouheif E., Akam M., Dickinson W. J., Holland P. W. H., Meyer A., Patel N. H., Raff R. A., Roth V. L., Wray G. A.1997Homology and developmental genes. Trends Genet. 13, 432–433 (doi:10.1016/S0168-9525(97)01271-7) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abzhanov A., Extavour C. G., Groover A., Hodges S. A., Hoekstra H. E., Kramer E. M., Monteiro A.2008Are we there yet? Tracking the development of new model systems. Trends Genet. 24, 353–360 (doi:10.1016/j.tig.2008.04.002) - DOI - PubMed
    1. APG 2003An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 141, 399–436 (doi:10.1046/j.1095-8339.2003.t01-1-00158.x) - DOI
    1. Baum D. A., Whitlock B. A.1999Genetic clues to petal evolution. Curr. Biol. 9, 525–527 - PubMed
    1. Becker A., Theissen G.2003The major clades of MADS-box genes and their role in the development and evolution of flowering plants. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 29, 464–489 (doi:10.1016/S1055-7903(03)00207-0) - DOI - PubMed

Publication types