Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jan 1;24(1):15-20.
doi: 10.1101/gad.557910.

C/EBPbetaDeltauORF mice--a genetic model for uORF-mediated translational control in mammals

Affiliations

C/EBPbetaDeltauORF mice--a genetic model for uORF-mediated translational control in mammals

Klaus Wethmar et al. Genes Dev. .

Abstract

Upstream ORFs (uORFs) are translational control elements found predominantly in transcripts of key regulatory genes. No mammalian genetic model exists to experimentally validate the physiological relevance of uORF-regulated translation initiation. We report that mice deficient for the CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta (C/EBPbeta) uORF initiation codon fail to initiate translation of the autoantagonistic LIP (liver inhibitory protein) C/EBPbeta isoform. C/EBPbeta(DeltauORF) mice show hyperactivation of acute-phase response genes, persistent repression of E2F-regulated genes, delayed and blunted S-phase entry of hepatocytes after partial hepatectomy, and impaired osteoclast differentiation. These data and the widespread prevalence of uORFs in mammalian transcriptomes suggest a comprehensive role of uORF-regulated translation in (patho)physiology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Genetic ablation of cis-regulatory translational control by the C/EBPβ uORF. (A) Three protein isoforms (LAP* [38 kDa], LAP [35 kDa], and LIP [20 kDa]) are translated from consecutive in-frame initiation codons in the same transcript (Descombes and Schibler 1991). The C/EBPβ mRNA contains a conserved cis-regulatory small uORF (30 base pairs [bp], orange) terminating 4 bp upstream of the LAP initiation site in a different reading frame. (bd) Binding; (pA) poly(A) tail. (B) Translation of the uORF serves to strip ribosomes from their initiating Met-tRNAiMet (green to white) and prevents initiation at the proximate LAP initiation codon. Upon reloading of ribosomes with the ternary eIF2–GTP–Met-tRNAiMet complex (white to green), translation reinitiation from the downstream AUG codon generates LIP. In C/EBPβΔuORF mice, an A-to-U point mutation was designed to abrogate ribosomal initiation at the uORF start codon without changing the amino acid sequence of the C/EBPβ isoforms. Most ribosomes will thus initiate at the LAP AUG instead. (Display of LAP* translation was omitted for simplicity. For details on alternative start site selection, see Supplemental Fig. S1.) (C) Upon i.p. injection of LPS, LIP is strongly induced in C/EBPβWT (WT) but not in C/EBPβΔuORF livers (Δ). (h) Hours of LPS treatment; (α-tub.) α-tubulin; (k.o.) lysate of C/EBPβ knockout mouse. (D) In MEFs, LPS induces LIP expression in C/EBPβWT but not in C/EBPβΔuORF cells. (E) Representative luciferase reporter assay (n = 3) demonstrating increased luciferase reporter activity (luc.) in C/EBPβΔuORF (open triangles) as compared with C/EBPβWT (black squares) MEFs at indicated times after LPS treatment. Error bars show SEM.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The C/EBPβΔuORF mutation impairs osteoclast differentiation. (A) Tibia sections showing tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRACP)-stained osteoclasts (red staining, light-green counterstain) in C/EBPβΔuORF as compared with C/EBPβWT mice. (Arrowheads) Multinucleated osteoclasts; bars, 50 μm. The bar graph displays average osteoclast sizes as determined from six mice per genotype at 8 wk of age. (B) TRACP staining (red) showing osteoclast differentiation of bone marrow-derived precursors of C/EBPβΔuORF and C/EBPβWT mice after 6 d in culture with M-CSF and RANK-L (n = 6). (Arrowheads) Multinucleated osteoclasts. The bar graph displays the differential quantification of osteoclasts by the number of nuclei (n) per cell. (C) Immunoblot analysis showing LIP expression in C/EBPβWT but not in C/EBPβΔuORF osteoclasts at day 2 of culture. (D) Immunoblot analysis showing increased MafB protein in C/EBPβΔuORF as compared with C/EBPβWT osteoclasts. (E) Real-time PCR analysis showing decreased expression of MafB-regulated osteoclast markers in C/EBPβΔuORF (open bars) as compared with C/EBPβWT (black bars) osteoclasts. Normalized to Gapdh (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate-dehydrogenase) and presented relative to C/EBPβWT (set to 1, dashed line). Error bars show SEM; (*) P < 0.05; (***) P < 0.001.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
The C/EBPβΔuORF mutation causes superinduction of C/EBPβ target genes. (A) Induction of LIP in C/EBPβWT livers upon PH is abolished in C/EBPβΔuORF animals. (B) ELISA showing elevated average levels of serum IL-6 at 3 h and 6 h after PH in C/EBPβΔuORF (open triangles) as compared with C/EBPβWT (black squares) animals (n = 6; [**] P < 0.01). (C) Real-time PCR analysis demonstrating elevated mRNA contents of acute-phase response genes in C/EBPβΔuORF (open bars) as compared with C/EBPβWT (black bars) livers at indicated times after PH (n = 6; [*] P < 0.05; [**] P < 0.01). Error bars show SEM.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Cell proliferation defect in C/EBPβΔuORF mice. (A) In vitro proliferation assay demonstrating reduced expansion of C/EBPβΔuORF (open triangles) as compared with C/EBPβWT (black squares) MEF cultures (n = 5 independent embryos per genotype; [**] P < 0.01). (B) Quantification of BrdU-labeled hepatocyte nuclei (2-h pulse-labeling) in liver sections showing a reduced proportion of hepatocytes in S phase in C/EBPβΔuORF (open bars) as compared with C/EBPβWT (black bars) and C/EBPβLIP (gray bars) livers at 36 and 48 h after PH (n = 8, [***] P < 0.001; n = 7, [*] P < 0.05 vs. wild type, respectively). (C) BrdU immunofluorescence stainings of C/EBPβWT, C/EBPβΔuORF, and C/EBPβLIP liver sections 36 h after PH. Bars, 100 μm. (D) Real-time PCR analysis showing reduced mRNA contents of CcnA1, CcnA2, CcnB1, CcnE1, CcnE2, and Pcna in C/EBPβΔuORF (open bars) as compared with C/EBPβWT (black bars) andC/EBPβLIP (gray bars) livers at indicated times after PH. (n = 6, [*] P < 0.05, [**] P < 0.01 vs. wild type). (n.d.) Not determined. Error bars show SEM.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
The C/EBPβΔuORF mutation causes repression of E2F target genes. (A) Graphic representation of a genome-wide microarray expression analysis comparing transcript levels in C/EBPβWT and C/EBPβΔuORF liver at 36 h after PH. (B) Representative ChIP assay on C/EBPβWT liver chromatin showing the association of E2F3, C/EBPα, and C/EBPβ to indicated gene promoters in regenerating liver at 36 h after PH (n = 2). (C) Luciferase reporter assay demonstrating the repressive function of long (black bars), but not of truncated (open bars) C/EBPα and C/EBPβ isoforms on the pGL3TATAbasic-6xE2F reporter construct (n = 3). (luc) Luciferase activity; (p42 and p30) long and truncated C/EBPα isoforms. (D) Luciferase reporter assay with constant, intermediately repressive C/EBPα p42 expression (luciferase activity set to 0.5) showing the corepressive function of LAP* and LAP (black bars) and the derepressive function of LIP (open bars) on the same E2F-responsive reporter construct as used in C (n = 3). Error bars show SEM.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akira S. IL-6-regulated transcription factors. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 1997;29:1401–1418. - PubMed
    1. Alonzi T, Maritano D, Gorgoni B, Rizzuto G, Libert C, Poli V. Essential role of STAT3 in the control of the acute-phase response as revealed by inducible gene activation in the liver. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21:1621–1632. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baer M, Johnson PF. Generation of truncated C/EBPβ isoforms by in vitro proteolysis. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:26582–26590. - PubMed
    1. Bracken AP, Ciro M, Cocito A, Helin K. E2F target genes: Unraveling the biology. Trends Biochem Sci. 2004;29:409–417. - PubMed
    1. Calkhoven CF, Muller C, Leutz A. Translational control of C/EBPα and C/EBPβ isoform expression. Genes & Dev. 2000;14:1920–1932. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances