Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Oct-Dec;51(4):310-9.
doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.58302.

Moving towards ICD-11 and DSM-V: Concept and evolution of psychiatric classification

Affiliations

Moving towards ICD-11 and DSM-V: Concept and evolution of psychiatric classification

P K Dalal et al. Indian J Psychiatry. 2009 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

A classification is as good as its theory. As the etiology of psychiatric disorders is still not clearly known, we still define them categorically by their clinical syndrome. There are doubts if they are valid discrete disease entities and if dimensional models are better to study them. We have come a long way till ICD-10 and DSM-IV, but there are shortcomings. With advances in genetics and neurobiology in the future, classification of psychiatric disorders should improve further. The concept, evolution, current status and challenges facing psychiatric classification are discussed in this review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared

Figures

Flow chart 1
Flow chart 1
Evolution of ICD and DSM classification and important landmarks
Flow chart 2
Flow chart 2
Evolution of knowledge about a disease entity

References

    1. Zimmerman M, Spitzer RL. Psychiatric classification. In: Sadock BJ, Sadock VA, editors. Kaplan and Sadock's comprehensive textbook of psychiatry. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins;
    1. Jablensky A, Kendell RE. Criteria for assessing a classification in psychiatry. In: Maj M, editor. Psychiatric diagnosis and classification. West Sussex: John Wiley and sons Ltd; 2002. pp. 1–24.
    1. Kendell RE. Five criteria for an improved taxonomy of mental. In: Helzer JE, Hudziak J, editors. Defining psychopathology in the 21st century: DSM-V and beyond. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2002. pp. 3–18.
    1. First MB, Pincus HA, Levine JB, Williams JB, Ustun B, Peele R. Clinical utility as a criterion for revising psychiatric diagnoses. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;16:946–54. - PubMed
    1. Hyman SE. Diagnosing disorders. Sci Am. 2003;289:96–103. - PubMed