Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jan;125(1):363-371.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c2a4b0.

Difficulties with subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty and its correction: the role of subglandular site change in revision aesthetic breast surgery

Affiliations

Difficulties with subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty and its correction: the role of subglandular site change in revision aesthetic breast surgery

Malcolm A Lesavoy et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Difficulties that arise with subpectoral breast implant placement include the following: malpositioning of the implant; improper superior contouring; and unnatural movement with chest muscle contraction. Correction of these deformities is easily achieved by removal of the subpectoral implant, resuspension of the pectoralis major muscle to the chest wall, and reaugmentation with a new implant in the subglandular plane. This study defines a correction modality for the adverse results of subpectoral implant placement in augmentation mammaplasty.

Methods: Pectoralis major resuspension was performed in 36 patients undergoing revision aesthetic breast surgery from 1995 to 2006. All patients had previously placed subpectoral breast implants performed elsewhere with unwanted movement, malposition, and/or capsular contracture. All patients underwent explantation of the breast implant, modified capsulectomy, pectoralis major resuspension, and reaugmentation of the breast in the subglandular position. In cases of symmastia, medial capsulodesis and sternal bolster sutures were used. Patients were evaluated for resolution of symptoms, satisfaction, and complications.

Results: Malposition (62 percent), capsular contracture (53 percent), and symmastia (10 percent) were the most common indications for revision, but 100 percent of patients were dissatisfied with abnormal breast movement. The average follow-up time was 20 months. The silicone implants were commonly used, with an average volume change decrease of 27 cc. Unwanted implant movement was eliminated completely (100 percent), symmastia was corrected (100 percent), and capsular contraction was significantly decreased in each respective group. Patient satisfaction with this procedure was high, with a low complication rate.

Conclusions: Pectoralis major resuspension can be performed successfully in aesthetic breast surgery. It can be applied safely to correct problems of unwanted implant movement, symmastia implant malposition, and capsular contraction. The use of silicone gel implants in a novel tissue plane may be beneficial in this diverse, reoperative patient population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Retrocapsular pocket to correct symmastia.
    Harley OJH, Arnstein PM. Harley OJH, et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Jul;128(1):329-331. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182174661. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011. PMID: 21701362 No abstract available.

References

    1. Lesavoy MA. Breast augmentation techniques. In: Mathes SJ, ed. Plastic Surgery: Vol. 6. Trunk and Lower Extremity. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2006:35–46.
    1. Hidalgo DA. Breast augmentation: Choosing the optimal incision, implant, and pocket plane. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105;2202–2216.
    1. Biggs TM, Yarish RS. Augmentation mammaplasty: A comparative analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;85:368–372.
    1. Dempsey WC, Latham WD. Subpectoral implants in augmentation mammaplasty: Preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1968;42:515–521.
    1. Regnault R. Partially submuscular breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;59:72–76.

LinkOut - more resources