Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Sep;4(5):358-63.
doi: 10.1097/COH.0b013e32832ea7e8.

Specificity of the autologous neutralizing antibody response

Affiliations
Review

Specificity of the autologous neutralizing antibody response

Penny L Moore et al. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2009 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose of review: It has long been known that autologous neutralizing antibodies (AnAbs) exert pressure on the envelope of HIV, resulting in neutralization escape. However, recently, progress has been made in uncovering the precise targets of these potent early antibodies.

Recent findings: AnAbs primarily target variable regions of the HIV-1 envelope, explaining the strain-specificity of these antibodies. Despite high neutralizing potential and cross-reactivity, anti-V3 antibodies do not contribute to autologous neutralization. The V1V2 is commonly immunogenic in early HIV-1 and simian human immunodeficiency virus infections, though the nature of these epitopes remains to be determined. In subtype C viruses, the C3 region is a neutralization target, possibly as a result of its more exposed and amphipathic structure. Autologous neutralization appears to be mediated by very few AnAb specificities that develop sequentially suggesting the possibility of immunological hierarchies for both binding and neutralizing antibodies. The role of AnAbs in preventing superinfection and in restricting virus replication is reexamined in the context of recent data.

Summary: New studies have greatly contributed toward our understanding of the specificities mediating autologous neutralization and highlighted potential vulnerabilities on transmitted viruses. However, the contribution of AnAbs to the development of neutralization breadth remains to be characterized.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gray ES, Moore PL, Choge IA, Decker JM, Bibollet-Ruche F, et al. Neutralizing antibody responses in acute human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtype C infection. J Virol. 2007;81:6187–6196. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li B, Decker JM, Johnson RW, Bibollet-Ruche F, Wei X, et al. Evidence for potent autologous neutralizing antibody titers and compact envelopes in early infection with subtype C human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Virol. 2006;80:5211–5218. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Richman DD, Wrin T, Little SJ, Petropoulos CJ. Rapid evolution of the neutralizing antibody response to HIV type 1 infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:4144–4149. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wei X, Decker JM, Wang S, Hui H, Kappes JC, et al. Antibody neutralization and escape by HIV-1. Nature. 2003;422:307–312. - PubMed
    1. Tomaras GD, Yates NL, Liu P, Qin L, Fouda GG, et al. Initial B-cell responses to transmitted human immunodeficiency virus type 1: virion-binding immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG antibodies followed by plasma anti-gp41 antibodies with ineffective control of initial viremia. J Virol. 2008;82:12449–12463. First detailed analysis of the ontogeny of B cell responses to transmitted HIV-1 subtype B viruses, showing a relatively well-defined hierarchy of binding antibody responses starting from 8 days after the detection of viremia which precede the development of neutralizing antibody responses.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances