Revisiting host preference in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex: experimental infection shows M. tuberculosis H37Rv to be avirulent in cattle
- PMID: 20049086
- PMCID: PMC2795854
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008527
Revisiting host preference in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex: experimental infection shows M. tuberculosis H37Rv to be avirulent in cattle
Abstract
Experiments in the late 19th century sought to define the host specificity of the causative agents of tuberculosis in mammals. Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the human tubercle bacillus, was independently shown by Smith, Koch, and von Behring to be avirulent in cattle. This finding was erroneously used by Koch to argue the converse, namely that Mycobacterium bovis, the agent of bovine tuberculosis, was avirulent for man, a view that was subsequently discredited. However, reports in the literature of M. tuberculosis isolation from cattle with tuberculoid lesions suggests that the virulence of M. tuberculosis for cattle needs to be readdressed. We used an experimental bovine infection model to test the virulence of well-characterized strains of M. tuberculosis and M. bovis in cattle, choosing the genome-sequenced strains M. tuberculosis H37Rv and M. bovis 2122/97. Cattle were infected with approximately 10(6) CFU of M. tuberculosis H37Rv or M. bovis 2122/97, and sacrificed 17 weeks post-infection. IFN-gamma and tuberculin skin tests indicated that both M. bovis 2122 and M. tuberculosis H37Rv were equally infective and triggered strong cell-mediated immune responses, albeit with some indication of differential antigen-specific responses. Postmortem examination revealed that while M. bovis 2122/97-infected animals all showed clear pathology indicative of bovine tuberculosis, the M. tuberculosis-infected animals showed no pathology. Culturing of infected tissues revealed that M. tuberculosis was able to persist in the majority of animals, albeit at relatively low bacillary loads. In revisiting the early work on host preference across the M. tuberculosis complex, we have shown M. tuberculosis H37Rv is avirulent for cattle, and propose that the immune status of the animal, or genotype of the infecting bacillus, may have significant bearing on the virulence of a strain for cattle. This work will serve as a baseline for future studies into the genetic basis of host preference, and in particular the molecular basis of virulence in M. bovis.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures



Similar articles
-
Innate cytokine profiling of bovine alveolar macrophages reveals commonalities and divergence in the response to Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection.Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2014 Jul;94(4):441-50. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2014.04.004. Epub 2014 May 5. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2014. PMID: 24882682
-
Comparative 'omics analyses differentiate Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis and reveal distinct macrophage responses to infection with the human and bovine tubercle bacilli.Microb Genom. 2018 Mar;4(3):e000163. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000163. Epub 2018 Mar 20. Microb Genom. 2018. PMID: 29557774 Free PMC article.
-
Mycobacterium bovis with different genotypes and from different hosts induce dissimilar immunopathological lesions in a mouse model of tuberculosis.Clin Exp Immunol. 2009 Jul;157(1):139-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2009.03923.x. Clin Exp Immunol. 2009. PMID: 19659779 Free PMC article.
-
Does Mycobacterium bovis persist in cattle in a non-replicative latent state as Mycobacterium tuberculosis in human beings?Vet Microbiol. 2020 Aug;247:108758. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108758. Epub 2020 Jun 21. Vet Microbiol. 2020. PMID: 32768211 Review.
-
Cell-Mediated Immunological Biomarkers and Their Diagnostic Application in Livestock and Wildlife Infected With Mycobacterium bovis.Front Immunol. 2021 Mar 4;12:639605. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.639605. eCollection 2021. Front Immunol. 2021. PMID: 33746980 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The TbD1 Locus Mediates a Hypoxia-Induced Copper Response in Mycobacterium bovis.Front Microbiol. 2022 Apr 14;13:817952. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.817952. eCollection 2022. Front Microbiol. 2022. PMID: 35495699 Free PMC article.
-
Animal models for COVID-19 and tuberculosis.Front Immunol. 2023 Aug 11;14:1223260. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1223260. eCollection 2023. Front Immunol. 2023. PMID: 37638020 Free PMC article. Review.
-
TBVAC2020: Advancing Tuberculosis Vaccines from Discovery to Clinical Development.Front Immunol. 2017 Oct 4;8:1203. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01203. eCollection 2017. Front Immunol. 2017. PMID: 29046674 Free PMC article. Review.
-
In Silico Exploration of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Metabolic Networks Shows Host-Associated Convergent Fluxomic Phenotypes.Biomolecules. 2022 Feb 28;12(3):376. doi: 10.3390/biom12030376. Biomolecules. 2022. PMID: 35327567 Free PMC article.
-
A New Phylogenetic Framework for the Animal-Adapted Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex.Front Microbiol. 2018 Nov 27;9:2820. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02820. eCollection 2018. Front Microbiol. 2018. PMID: 30538680 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cole ST, Brosch R, Parkhill J, Garnier T, Churcher C, et al. Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence. Nature. 1998;393:537–544. - PubMed
-
- Smith NH, Kremer K, Inwald JJ, Dale J, Driscoll JR, et al. Ecotypes of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. J Theo Biol. 2006;239:220–225. - PubMed
-
- Smith T. Two varieties of the tubercle bacillus from mammals. Trans Assoc Am Physicians. 1896;11:75–95.
-
- von Behring E. Serum Therapy in Therapeutics and Medical Science. Nobel Lectures, Physiology or Medicine 1901-1921: World Scientific Publishing Company. 1901.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources