Toxicological assessment of toxic element residues in swine kidney and its role in public health risk assessment
- PMID: 20049251
- PMCID: PMC2800339
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph6123127
Toxicological assessment of toxic element residues in swine kidney and its role in public health risk assessment
Abstract
In order to ensure the safety of consumers in Serbia the prevalence of toxic elements (As, Cd, Hg, Pb) in swine kidney collected from three different areas in Serbia (n = 90) was determined by atomic absorption spectrometry. Also, in order to find information on the effects of accumulation of toxic elements on swine kidney, pathohistological examination of the kidneys was performed. The presence of mercury was found in 33.3% of kidney samples in the range of 0.005-0.055 mg/kg, while the presence of cadmium was detected less often (27.7%) but in larger amounts (0.05-1.23 mg/kg). The presence of arsenic was found only in one sample, while no lead was found. The results of the metal-to-metal correlation analysis supported there were the result of different sources of contamination. Pathohistological examination of kidneys confirms tubulopathies with oedema and cell vacuolization. In addition, haemorrhages and necrosis of proximal kidney tubule cells were found. This study demonstrates that toxic elements in Serbian slaughtered pigs are found at levels comparable to those reported in other countries, and consequently the levels reported in this study do not represent a concern from a consumer safety point of view. The lack of a strong correlation between histopathological changes and the incidence of toxic elements found in this study might be explained as the result of synergism among toxic elements and other nephrotoxic compounds which enhance the toxicity of the individual toxins even at the relatively low mean concentrations observed in this study.
Keywords: kidney; pathomorphology; residue; swine; toxic elements.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Determination of toxic elements (mercury, cadmium, lead, tin and arsenic) in fish and shellfish samples. Risk assessment for the consumers.Environ Int. 2013 Sep;59:63-72. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2013.05.005. Epub 2013 Jun 19. Environ Int. 2013. PMID: 23792415
-
Hazards of heavy metal contamination.Br Med Bull. 2003;68:167-82. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldg032. Br Med Bull. 2003. PMID: 14757716 Review.
-
Risk assessment and prediction for toxic heavy metals in chestnut and growth soil from China.J Sci Food Agric. 2019 Jun;99(8):4114-4122. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.9641. Epub 2019 Mar 27. J Sci Food Agric. 2019. PMID: 30761542
-
Concentrations of arsenic, cadmium and lead in selected foodstuffs from Serbian market basket: estimated intake by the population from the Serbia.Food Chem Toxicol. 2013 Aug;58:440-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2013.05.026. Epub 2013 May 24. Food Chem Toxicol. 2013. PMID: 23712093
-
Elementary Overview of Heavy Metals.Clin Chem. 2023 Apr 3;69(4):336-349. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvad022. Clin Chem. 2023. PMID: 36945128 Review.
References
-
- Satarug S, Baker JR, Urbenjapol S, Haswell-Elkins MR, Reilly PEB, Williams DJ. A global perspective on cadmium pollution and toxicity in non-occupationally exposed population. Toxicol. Lett. 2003;137:65–83. - PubMed
-
- Zaidi MI, Asrar A, Mansoor A, Farooqui MA. The heavy metal concentrations along roadside trees of Quetta and its effects on public health. J. Appl. Sci. 2005;5:708–711.
-
- D’Mello JPF. Food Safety: Contaminants and Toxins. CABI Publishing; Wallingford, Oxon, Cambridge, MA, UK: 2003. p. 480.
-
- Jarup L. Hazards of heavy metal contamination. Br. Med. Bull. 2003;68:167–182. - PubMed
-
- Sathawara NG, Parikh DJ, Agarwal YK. Essential heavy metals in environmental samples from western India. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2004;73:756–761. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials