Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Feb 28;29(5):597-613.
doi: 10.1002/sim.3823.

Hybrid pooled-unpooled design for cost-efficient measurement of biomarkers

Affiliations

Hybrid pooled-unpooled design for cost-efficient measurement of biomarkers

Enrique F Schisterman et al. Stat Med. .

Abstract

Evaluating biomarkers in epidemiological studies can be expensive and time consuming. Many investigators use techniques such as random sampling or pooling biospecimens in order to cut costs and save time on experiments. Commonly, analyses based on pooled data are strongly restricted by distributional assumptions that are challenging to validate because of the pooled biospecimens. Random sampling provides data that can be easily analyzed. However, random sampling methods are not optimal cost-efficient designs for estimating means. We propose and examine a cost-efficient hybrid design that involves taking a sample of both pooled and unpooled data in an optimal proportion in order to efficiently estimate the unknown parameters of the biomarker distribution. In addition, we find that this design can be used to estimate and account for different types of measurement and pooling error, without the need to collect validation data or repeated measurements. We show an example where application of the hybrid design leads to minimization of a given loss function based on variances of the estimators of the unknown parameters. Monte Carlo simulation and biomarker data from a study on coronary heart disease are used to demonstrate the proposed methodology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
a. Variance of the mean estimator for both rounded and unrounded values of p, for the case of N=3000, n=1000, σx2=1, and σm2=0.1. b. Variance of the variance estimator for both rounded and unrounded values of p, for the case of N=3000, n=1000, σx2=1, and σm2=0.1.

References

    1. Dorfman R. The detection of defective members of large populations. Annals of Mathematical Statistics. 1943;14:436–440.
    1. Faraggi D, Reiser B, Schisterman EF. ROC curve analysis for biomarkers based on pooled assessments. Statistics in Medicine. 2003;22:2515–2527. - PubMed
    1. Mumford SL, Schisterman EF, Vexler A, Liu A. Pooling biospecimens and limits of detection: effects on ROC curve analysis. Biostatistics. 2006;7:585–598. - PubMed
    1. Schisterman EF, Vexler A. To pool or not to pool, from whether to when: applications of pooling to biospecimens subject to a limit of detection. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology. 2008;22:486–496. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vexler A, Liu A, Schisterman EF. Efficient design and analysis of biospecimens with measurements subject to detection limit. Biometrical Journal. 2006;48:780–791. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources