Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 May;80(3):425-34.
doi: 10.2319/052309-292.1.

Comparative use of Invisalign by orthodontists and general practitioners

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparative use of Invisalign by orthodontists and general practitioners

José Vicéns et al. Angle Orthod. 2010 May.

Abstract

Objective: To test the hypothesis that there is no difference in the use of Invisalign between orthodontists and general practitioners.

Materials and methods: A questionnaire was mailed to all Invisalign providers within a 35-mile radius of Stony Brook University. The answers were statistically analyzed. The level of significance was set at P < .05.

Results: Orthodontists started more Invisalign cases (P < .0001). General practitioners started more Invisalign cases in the last 12 months (P = .0012). For both groups, the percentage of cases started in the last 12 months was inversely related to the number of years certified in Invisalign (P < .0001). Significant differences in opinion (P < .001) were noted between orthodontists and general practitioners regarding the level of experience necessary to treat a Class I malocclusion with a large diastema, and whether a Class II subdivision case should be treated with Invisalign.

Conclusion: The hypothesis is rejected. The use of Invisalign by orthodontists and general practitioners was compared, and significant differences were found.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Case 1.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Case 2.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Case 3.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Case 4.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Case 5.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Case 6.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Roberts W. E. Reflecting on the orthodontic educational development symposium. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;111:110–115. - PubMed
    1. Christensen G. J. Orthodontics and the general practitioner. J Am Dent Assoc. 2002;133:369–371. - PubMed
    1. Smith R. J. General practitioners and orthodontics [letter to the editor] Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987;92:169–172. - PubMed
    1. Koroluk L. D, Jones J. E, Avery D. R. Analysis of orthodontic treatment by pediatric dentists and general practitioners in Indiana. J Dent Child. 1988;55:97–101. - PubMed
    1. Wolsky S. L, McNamara J. A., Jr Orthodontic services provided by general dentists. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110:211–217. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms