Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 May;80(3):485-91.
doi: 10.2319/062709-359.1.

Treatment effects of twin-block and mandibular protraction appliance-IV in the correction of class II malocclusion

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Treatment effects of twin-block and mandibular protraction appliance-IV in the correction of class II malocclusion

Ashok Kumar Jena et al. Angle Orthod. 2010 May.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the treatment effects of twin-block and Mandibular Protraction Appliance-IV (MPA-IV) in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion.

Methods: Fifty North Indian girls with Class II division 1 malocclusion, in the age range of 9-13 years, were chosen. The subjects were divided among a control group (n = 10), a twin-block group (n = 25), and an MPA group (n = 15). Pre-follow-up and post-follow-up lateral cephalograms of control subjects and pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalograms of the treatment subjects were traced manually and subjected to a pitchfork analysis.

Results: Neither twin-block nor MPA-IV significantly restricted the forward growth of maxilla. Mandibular growth and improvement in the sagittal skeletal relation were significantly greater in the twin-block subjects. Distal movement of the maxillary dentition and mesial movement of the mandibular dentition were more prominent in the MPA-IV subjects. Molar correction and overjet reductions were significantly greater in the treatment subjects (P < .001).

Conclusion: Twin-block and MPA-IV were effective in correcting the molar relationships and reducing the overjet in Class II division 1 malocclusion subjects. However, twin-block contributed more skeletal effects than MPA-IV for the correction of Class II malocclusion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The Pitchfork diagram. Cranial base indicates base of the cranium; maxilla, maxillary change in relation to the cranial base; mandible, mandibular change in relation to the cranial base; ABCH, antero-posterior change in the relationship between maxilla and mandible; total U6, total upper molar movement; total L6, total lower molar movement; total molar, ABCH + total U6 + total L6, the change in molar relationship; total U1, total upper incisor movement; total L1, total lower incisor movement; overjet, ABCH + total U1 + total L1, the change in incisor relationship.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pitchfork changes in the control group.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Pitchfork changes in the twin-block group.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Pitchfork changes in the mandibular protraction appliance group.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Comparison of skeletal changes among the three groups.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Comparison of dental changes among three groups.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Firouz M, Zernik J, Nanda R. Dental and orthopedic effects of high-pull headgear in treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;102:197–205. - PubMed
    1. Jasper J. J. The Jasper Jumper—A Fixed Functional Appliance. Sheboygan, WI: American Orthodontics; 1987.
    1. Coelho Filho C. M. Mandibular protraction appliances for Class II treatment. J Clin Orthod. 1995;29:319–336. - PubMed
    1. Coelho Filho C. M. Clinical applications of the mandibular protraction appliance. J Clin Orthod. 1997;31:92–102. - PubMed
    1. Coelho Filho C. M. The mandibular protraction appliance no. 3. J Clin Orthod. 1998;32:379–384. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources