Treatment effects of twin-block and mandibular protraction appliance-IV in the correction of class II malocclusion
- PMID: 20050741
- PMCID: PMC8985713
- DOI: 10.2319/062709-359.1
Treatment effects of twin-block and mandibular protraction appliance-IV in the correction of class II malocclusion
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the treatment effects of twin-block and Mandibular Protraction Appliance-IV (MPA-IV) in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion.
Methods: Fifty North Indian girls with Class II division 1 malocclusion, in the age range of 9-13 years, were chosen. The subjects were divided among a control group (n = 10), a twin-block group (n = 25), and an MPA group (n = 15). Pre-follow-up and post-follow-up lateral cephalograms of control subjects and pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalograms of the treatment subjects were traced manually and subjected to a pitchfork analysis.
Results: Neither twin-block nor MPA-IV significantly restricted the forward growth of maxilla. Mandibular growth and improvement in the sagittal skeletal relation were significantly greater in the twin-block subjects. Distal movement of the maxillary dentition and mesial movement of the mandibular dentition were more prominent in the MPA-IV subjects. Molar correction and overjet reductions were significantly greater in the treatment subjects (P < .001).
Conclusion: Twin-block and MPA-IV were effective in correcting the molar relationships and reducing the overjet in Class II division 1 malocclusion subjects. However, twin-block contributed more skeletal effects than MPA-IV for the correction of Class II malocclusion.
Figures






Similar articles
-
Effectiveness of twin-block and Mandibular Protraction Appliance-IV in the improvement of pharyngeal airway passage dimensions in Class II malocclusion subjects with a retrognathic mandible.Angle Orthod. 2013 Jul;83(4):728-34. doi: 10.2319/083112-702.1. Epub 2012 Dec 14. Angle Orthod. 2013. PMID: 23241007 Free PMC article.
-
Dental and skeletal changes in patients with mandibular retrognathism following treatment with Herbst and pre-adjusted fixed appliance.Dental Press J Orthod. 2014 Jan-Feb;19(1):46-54. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.1.046-054.oar. Dental Press J Orthod. 2014. PMID: 24713559 Free PMC article.
-
Skeletal Class II treatment with Twin Force Bite Corrector: case reports.World J Orthod. 2008 Fall;9(3):e7-17. World J Orthod. 2008. PMID: 19641763
-
Comparison of Twin Block appliance and Herbst appliance in the treatment of Class II malocclusion among children: a meta-analysis.BMC Oral Health. 2024 Feb 26;24(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04027-w. BMC Oral Health. 2024. PMID: 38409017 Free PMC article.
-
Timing of early correction of mandibular hypoplasia in skeletal class II malocclusion: a review.J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 Nov;47(6):11-20. doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2023.077. Epub 2023 Nov 3. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023. PMID: 37997230 Review.
Cited by
-
The assessment of sagittal changes with twin block appliance in patients with decelerating growth phase.J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Dec;8(12):ZC81-4. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/10747.5354. Epub 2014 Dec 5. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014. PMID: 25654039 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of Changes in Craniofacial Structures, Bite Force and Periodontal Status Following Fixed Functional Appliance Therapy.Turk J Orthod. 2023 Mar 21;36(1):22-29. doi: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2022.2021.0229. Turk J Orthod. 2023. PMID: 36967592 Free PMC article.
-
Splinted mandibular protraction appliance.Contemp Clin Dent. 2015 Mar;6(Suppl 1):S129-33. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.152971. Contemp Clin Dent. 2015. PMID: 25821367 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of twin-block and Mandibular Protraction Appliance-IV in the improvement of pharyngeal airway passage dimensions in Class II malocclusion subjects with a retrognathic mandible.Angle Orthod. 2013 Jul;83(4):728-34. doi: 10.2319/083112-702.1. Epub 2012 Dec 14. Angle Orthod. 2013. PMID: 23241007 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of two different mandibular advancement methods: conventional technique vs aesthetic approach.Eur Oral Res. 2022 May 5;56(2):96-101. doi: 10.26650/eor.2022939871. Eur Oral Res. 2022. PMID: 36003847 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Firouz M, Zernik J, Nanda R. Dental and orthopedic effects of high-pull headgear in treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;102:197–205. - PubMed
-
- Jasper J. J. The Jasper Jumper—A Fixed Functional Appliance. Sheboygan, WI: American Orthodontics; 1987.
-
- Coelho Filho C. M. Mandibular protraction appliances for Class II treatment. J Clin Orthod. 1995;29:319–336. - PubMed
-
- Coelho Filho C. M. Clinical applications of the mandibular protraction appliance. J Clin Orthod. 1997;31:92–102. - PubMed
-
- Coelho Filho C. M. The mandibular protraction appliance no. 3. J Clin Orthod. 1998;32:379–384. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources