Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Apr;45(2):376-96.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01068.x. Epub 2009 Dec 30.

Comparison of health outcomes for male seniors in the Veterans Health Administration and Medicare Advantage plans

Alfredo J Selim  1 , Dan Berlowitz, Lewis E Kazis, William Rogers, Steven M Wright, Shirley X Qian, James A Rothendler, Avron Spiro 3rd, Donald Miller, Bernardo J Selim, Benjamin G Fincke
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of health outcomes for male seniors in the Veterans Health Administration and Medicare Advantage plans

Alfredo J Selim et al. Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) with the Medicare Advantage (MA) plans with regard to health outcomes.

Data sources: The Medicare Health Outcome Survey, the 1999 Large Health Survey of Veteran Enrollees, and the Ambulatory Care Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients (Fiscal Years 2002 and 2003).

Study design: A retrospective study.

Extraction methods: Men 65+ receiving care in MA (N=198,421) or in VHA (N=360,316). We compared the risk-adjusted probability of being alive with the same or better physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) health at 2-years follow-up. We computed hazard ratio (HR) for 2-year mortality.

Principal findings: Veterans had a higher adjusted probability of being alive with the same or better PCS compared with MA participants (VHA 69.2 versus MA 63.6 percent, p<.001). VHA patients had a higher adjusted probability than MA patients of being alive with the same or better MCS (76.1 versus 69.6 percent, p<.001). The HRs for mortality in the MA were higher than in the VHA (HR, 1.26 [95 percent CI 1.23-1.29]).

Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the VHA has better patient outcomes than the private managed care plans in Medicare. The VHA's performance offers encouragement that the public sector can both finance and provide exemplary health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Medicare Advantage and Veterans Health Administration Populations
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Anand SS, Razak F, Davis AD, Jacobs R, Vuskan V, Teo K, Yusuf S. Social Disadvantage and Cardiovascular Disease: Development of an Index and Analysis of Age, Sex, and Ethnicity Effects. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2006;35:1239–45. - PubMed
    1. Asch SM, McGlynn EA, Hogan MM, Hayward RA, Shekelle P, Rubenstein L, Keesey J, Adams J, Kerr EA. Comparison of Quality of Care for Patients in the Veterans Health Administration and Patients in a National Sample. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2004;141:938–45. - PubMed
    1. Asch SM. Who Is at Greatest Risk for Receiving Poor-Quality Health Care? New England Journal of Medicine. 2006;354:1147–56. - PubMed
    1. Bayliss EA, Bayliss MS, Ware JE, Jr., Steiner JF. Predicting Declines in Physical Function in Persons with Multiple Chronic Medical Conditions: What We Can Learn from the Medical Problem List. Health Quality of Life Outcomes. 2004;2:47. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berlowitz DR, Young GJ, Brandeis GH, Kader B, Anderson JJ. Health Care Reorganization and Quality of Care: Unintended Effects on Pressure Ulcer Prevention. Medical Care. 2001;39:138–46. - PubMed

Publication types