Similar articles

• Assessing the perceived prevalence of research fraud among faculty at research-intensive universities in the USA.

  Reisig MD, Holtfreter K, Berzofsky ME. Reisig MD, et al. Account Res. 2020 Oct;27(7):457-475. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2020.1772060. Epub 2020 Jun 1. Account Res. 2020. PMID: 32438829
• With those pressures, there have been more cases of plagiarism, scientific fraud and misconduct.

  Eccles S, Irimura T, Welch D. Eccles S, et al. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2009;26(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s10585-008-9229-4. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2009. PMID: 19089592 No abstract available.
• Stat bite: Types of research misconduct.

  [No authors listed] [No authors listed] J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Jan 2;100(1):8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm292. Epub 2007 Dec 25. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008. PMID: 18159064 No abstract available.
• Publication fraud: implications to the individual and to the specialty.

  Miller DR. Miller DR. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Apr;24(2):154-9. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328344529d. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011. PMID: 21252647 Review.
• [Research Misconduct in Japan and How It Is Covered by the Media].

  Enoki E. Enoki E. Yakugaku Zasshi. 2018;138(4):459-464. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.17-00181-1. Yakugaku Zasshi. 2018. PMID: 29607989 Review. Japanese.