Spontaneous and ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutations controlling viability in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Homozygous effect of polygenic mutations
- PMID: 200526
- PMCID: PMC1213759
- DOI: 10.1093/genetics/87.3.529
Spontaneous and ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutations controlling viability in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Homozygous effect of polygenic mutations
Abstract
Polygenic mutations affecting viability were accumulated on the second chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster by treating flies with EMS in successive generations. The treated chromosomes were later made homozygous and tested for their effects on viability by comparison of the frequency of such homozygotes with that of other genotypes in the same culture. The treated wild-type chromosomes were kept heterozygous in Pm/+ males by mating individual males in successive generations to Cy/Pm females. The number of generations of accumulation was 1 to 30 generations, depending on the concentration of EMS. A similar experiment for spontaneous polygenic mutations was also conducted by accumulating mutations for 40 generations. The lower limit of the spontaneous mutation rate of viability polygenes is estimated to be 0.06 per second chromosome per generation, which is about 12 times as high as the spontaneous recessive lethal mutation rate, 0.005. EMS-induced polygenic mutations increase linearly with the number of treated generations and with the concentration of EMS. The minimum mutation rate of viability polygenes is about 0.017 per 10(-4)m, which is only slightly larger than the lethal rate of 0.013 per 10(-4) m. The maximum estimate of the viability reduction of a single mutant is about 6 to 10 percent of the normal viability. The data are consistent with a constant average effect per mutant at all concentrations, but this is about three times as high as that for spontaneous mutants. It is obvious that one can obtain only a lower limit for the mutation rate, since some mutants may have effects so near to zero that they cannot be detected. The possibility of measuring something other than the lower limit is discussed. The ratio of the load due to detrimental mutants to that caused by lethals, the D/L ratio, is about 0.2 to 0.3 for EMS-induced mutants, as compared to about 0.5 for spontaneous mutants. This is to be expected if EMS treatment produces a large fraction of small deletions and other chromosome rearrangements which are more likely to be lethal.
Comment in
-
On the rate and linearity of viability declines in Drosophila mutation-accumulation experiments: genomic mutation rates and synergistic epistasis revisited.Genetics. 2004 Feb;166(2):797-806. doi: 10.1534/genetics.166.2.797. Genetics. 2004. PMID: 15020469 Free PMC article.
Similar articles
-
Spontaneous and ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutations controlling viability in Drosophila melanogaster. III. Heterozygous effect of polygenic mutations.Genetics. 1977 Nov;87(3):547-56. doi: 10.1093/genetics/87.3.547. Genetics. 1977. PMID: 200527 Free PMC article.
-
Spontaneous and ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutations controlling viability in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Recessive lethal mutations.Genetics. 1977 Nov;87(3):519-27. doi: 10.1093/genetics/87.3.519. Genetics. 1977. PMID: 200525 Free PMC article.
-
Heterozygous effects on fitness of EMS-treated chromosomes in Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics. 1978 Mar;88(3):575-90. doi: 10.1093/genetics/88.3.575. Genetics. 1978. PMID: 205482 Free PMC article.
-
Fitness effects of EMS-induced mutations on the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Viability effects and heterozygous fitness effects.Genetics. 1977 Dec;87(4):763-74. doi: 10.1093/genetics/87.4.763. Genetics. 1977. PMID: 414960 Free PMC article.
-
The high spontaneous mutation rate: is it a health risk?Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Aug 5;94(16):8380-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.16.8380. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997. PMID: 9237985 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Analysis and implications of mutational variation.Genetica. 2009 Jun;136(2):359-69. doi: 10.1007/s10709-008-9304-4. Epub 2008 Jul 29. Genetica. 2009. PMID: 18663587 Review.
-
Purging deleterious mutations in conservation programmes: combining optimal contributions with inbred matings.Heredity (Edinb). 2013 Jun;110(6):530-7. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2012.119. Epub 2013 Jan 16. Heredity (Edinb). 2013. PMID: 23321706 Free PMC article.
-
Measurements of spontaneous rates of mutations in the recent past and the near future.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Apr 27;365(1544):1169-76. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0286. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010. PMID: 20308091 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The rate of mutation and the homozygous and heterozygous mutational effects for competitive viability: a long-term experiment with Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics. 2001 Jun;158(2):681-93. doi: 10.1093/genetics/158.2.681. Genetics. 2001. PMID: 11404332 Free PMC article.
-
Beneficial mutations, hitchhiking and the evolution of mutation rates in sexual populations.Genetics. 1999 Apr;151(4):1621-31. doi: 10.1093/genetics/151.4.1621. Genetics. 1999. PMID: 10101182 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases