Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Feb 15;116(4):913-21.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.24851.

Predictors of timely follow-up after abnormal cancer screening among women seeking care at urban community health centers

Affiliations

Predictors of timely follow-up after abnormal cancer screening among women seeking care at urban community health centers

Tracy A Battaglia et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: We sought to measure time and identify predictors of timely follow-up among a cohort of racially/ethnically diverse inner city women with breast and cervical cancer screening abnormalities.

Methods: Eligible women had an abnormality detected on a mammogram or Papanicolaou (Pap) test between January 2004 and December 2005 in 1 of 6 community health centers in Boston, Massachusetts. Retrospective chart review allowed us to measure time to diagnostic resolution. We used Cox proportional hazards models to develop predictive models for timely resolution (defined as definitive diagnostic services completed within 180 days from index abnormality).

Results: Among 523 women with mammography abnormalities and 474 women with Pap test abnormalities, >90% achieved diagnostic resolution within 12 months. Median time to resolution was longer for Pap test than for mammography abnormalities (85 vs 27 days). Site of care, rather than any sociodemographic characteristic of individuals, including race/ethnicity, was the only significant predictor of timely follow-up for both mammogram and Pap test abnormalities.

Conclusions: Site-specific community-based interventions may be the most effective interventions to reduce cancer health disparities when addressing the needs of underserved populations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jemal A, Thun MJ, Ries LA, et al. Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2005, Featuring Trends in Lung Cancer, Tobacco Use, and Tobacco Control. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(23):1672–94. - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2008. Atlanta: American Cancer Society 2008; 2008.
    1. Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Bureau of Health Information, Statistics, Research and Evaluation. Massachusetts Deaths, 2006. [October 17, 2008]. Available from: http://www.mass.gov/Eeohhs2/docs/dph/research_epi/death_report_06.pdf.
    1. Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Bureau of Health Information, Statistics, Research and Evaluation. Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Massachusetts, 2001 - 2005. [October 17, 2008]. Available from: http://www.mass.gov/Eeohhs2/docs/dph/cancer/registry_statewide_01_05_rep....
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data. Atlanta, Georgia: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2006. [October 17, 2008]. Available from: http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/brfss/, 2008.

Publication types

MeSH terms