Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Apr;31(4):421-8.
doi: 10.1002/humu.21196.

Complete ascertainment of intragenic copy number mutations (CNMs) in the CFTR gene and its implications for CNM formation at other autosomal loci

Affiliations

Complete ascertainment of intragenic copy number mutations (CNMs) in the CFTR gene and its implications for CNM formation at other autosomal loci

Sylvia Quemener et al. Hum Mutat. 2010 Apr.

Abstract

Over the last 20 years since the discovery of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene, more than 1,600 different putatively pathological CFTR mutations have been identified. Until now, however, copy number mutations (CNMs) involving the CFTR gene have not been methodically analyzed, resulting almost certainly in the underascertainment of CFTR gene duplications compared with deletions. Here, high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization (averaging one interrogating probe every 95 bp) was used to analyze the entire length of the CFTR gene (189 kb) in 233 cystic fibrosis chromosomes lacking conventional mutations. We succeeded in identifying five duplication CNMs that would otherwise have been refractory to analysis. Based upon findings from this and other studies, we propose that deletion and duplication CNMs in the human autosomal genome are likely to be generated in the proportion of approximately 2-3:1. We further postulate that intragenic gene duplication CNMs in other disease loci may have been routinely underascertained. Finally, our analysis of +/-20 bp flanking each of the 40 CFTR breakpoints characterized at the DNA sequence level provide support for the emerging concept that non-B DNA conformations in combination with specific sequence motifs predispose to both recurring and nonrecurring genomic rearrangements.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of cystic fibrosis-causing CNMs reported in this study. Upper panel: Genomic structure of the CFTR gene (scaled). Vertical bars represent the 27 exons. Lower panel: black horizontal lines indicate intragenic deletions whereas gray horizontal lines indicate intragenic duplications. Breakpoint ends not yet fully characterized are indicated by dots. The CNMs are arranged in the same order as in Table 1.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Examples of CFTR CNMs identified by array-CGH. Green plots indicate deletions, red plots duplications. CNM numbers are in accord with those described in Table 1 and Figure 1. Note that in A, the carrier is a compound heterozygote of CNMs 7 and 11.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Audrézet MP, Chen JM, Raguénès O, Chuzhanova N, Giteau K, Le Maréchal C, Quéré I, Cooper DN, Férec C. Genomic rearrangements in the CFTR gene: extensive allelic heterogeneity and diverse mutational mechanisms. Hum Mutat. 2004;23:343–357. - PubMed
    1. Audrézet MP, Dabricot A, Le Maréchal C, Férec C. Validation of high-resolution DNA melting analysis for mutation scanning of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene. J Mol Diagn. 2008;10:424–434. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bacolla A, Jaworski A, Larson JE, Jakupciak JP, Chuzhanova N, Abeysinghe SS, O’Connell CD, Cooper DN, Wells RD. Breakpoints of gross deletions coincide with non-B DNA conformations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:14162–14167. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bauters M, Van Esch H, Friez MJ, Boespflug-Tanguy O, Zenker M, Vianna-Morgante AM, Rosenberg C, Ignatius J, Raynaud M, Hollanders K, Govaerts K, Vandenreijt K, Niel F, Blanc P, Stevenson RE, Fryns JP, Marynen P, Schwartz CE, Froyen G. Nonrecurrent MECP2 duplications mediated by genomic architecture-driven DNA breaks and break-induced replication repair. Genome Res. 2008;18:847–858. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beckmann JS, Sharp AJ, Antonarakis SE. CNVs and genetic medicine (excitement and consequences of a rediscovery) Cytogenet Genome Res. 2008;123:7–16. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances