Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Nov;16(11):1096-102.
doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00546.x.

Research priorities for human immunodeficiency virus and sexually transmitted infections surveillance, screening, and intervention in emergency departments: consensus-based recommendations

Affiliations

Research priorities for human immunodeficiency virus and sexually transmitted infections surveillance, screening, and intervention in emergency departments: consensus-based recommendations

Jason S Haukoos et al. Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Nov.

Abstract

This article describes the results of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and sexually transmitted infections (STI) prevention in the emergency department (ED) component of the 2009 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference entitled "Public Health in the ED: Surveillance, Screening, and Intervention." The objectives were to use experts to define knowledge gaps and priority research questions related to the performance of HIV and STI surveillance, screening, and intervention in the ED. A four-step nominal group technique was applied using national and international experts in HIV and STI prevention. Using electronic mail, an in-person meeting, and a Web-based survey, specific knowledge gaps and research questions were identified and prioritized. Through two rounds of nomination and refinement, followed by two rounds of election, consensus was achieved for 11 knowledge gaps and 14 research questions related to HIV and STI prevention in EDs. The overarching themes of the research priority questions were related to effectiveness, sustainability, and integration. While the knowledge gaps appear disparate from one another, they are related to the research priority questions identified. Using a consensus approach, we developed a set of priorities for future research related to HIV and STI prevention in the ED. These priorities have the potential to improve future clinical and health services research and extramural funding in this important public health sector.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rhodes KV, Gordon JA, Lowe RA. Preventive care in the emergency department, part I: clinical preventive services–are they relevant to emergency medicine? Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Public Health and Education Task Force Preventive Services Work Group. Acad Emerg Med. 2000;7:1036–41. - PubMed
    1. Schur C, Mohr P, Zhao L. Emergency department use in Maryland: a profile of users, visits, and ambulance diversions. [Jul 26, 2009];The Project HOPE Center for Health Affairs, Maryland Health Commission. 2003 Available at: http://mhcc.maryland.gov/health_care_expenditures/extramural/emergdept.pdf.
    1. Monroe KW, Weiss HL, Jones M, Hook EW., III Acceptability of urine screening for Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis in adolescents at an urban emergency department. Sex Transm Dis. 2003;30:850–3. - PubMed
    1. Bachmann LH, Pigott D, Desmond R, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with gonorrhea and chlamydial infection in at-risk females presenting to an urban emergency department. Sex Transm Dis. 2003;30:335–9. - PubMed
    1. Todd CS, Haase C, Stoner BP. Emergency department screening for asymptomatic sexually transmitted infections. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:461–4. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types