Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Nov;16(11):1110-9.
doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00545.x.

Mental health and emergency medicine: a research agenda

Affiliations

Mental health and emergency medicine: a research agenda

Gregory Luke Larkin et al. Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Nov.

Abstract

The burden of mental illness is profound and growing. Coupled with large gaps in extant psychiatric services, this mental health burden has often forced emergency departments (EDs) to become the de facto primary and acute care provider of mental health care in the United States. An expanded emergency medical and mental health research agenda is required to meet the need for improved education, screening, surveillance, and ED-initiated interventions for mental health problems. As an increasing fraction of undiagnosed and untreated psychiatric patients passes through the revolving doors of U.S. EDs, the opportunities for improving the art and science of acute mental health care have never been greater. These opportunities span macroepidemiologic surveillance research to intervention studies with individual patients. Feasible screening, intervention, and referral programs for mental health patients presenting to general EDs are needed. Additional research is needed to improve the quality of care, including the attitudes, abilities, interests, and virtues of ED providers. Research that optimizes provider education and training can help academic settings validate psychosocial issues as core components and responsibilities of emergency medicine. Transdisciplinary research with federal partners and investigators in neuropsychiatry and related fields can improve the mechanistic understanding of acute mental health problems. To have lasting impact, however, advances in ED mental health care must be translated into real-world policies and sustainable program enhancements to assure the uptake of best practices for ED screening, treatment, and management of mental disorders and psychosocial problems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Expanded screening, brief intervention, brief treatment, and referral to treatment for suicide risk. Adapted from: http://www.sbirt.samhsa.gov/care_comp/index.htm.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of mortality, and research funding, by cause of death. National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), National Vital Statistics System. *http://www.nih.gov/news/fundingresearchareas.htm#1.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kessler RC, McGonagle KA, Zhao S, et al. Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States. Results from the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1994;51:8–19. - PubMed
    1. Murray C, Lopez A. The Global Burden of Disease: A Comprehensive Assessment of Mortality and Disability From Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors in 1990 and Projected to 2020. Vol 1. Harvard University Press; Boston, MA: 1996.
    1. Larkin GL, Claassen CA, Emond JA, Pelletier AJ, Camargo CA., Jr. Trends in U.S. emergency department visits for mental health conditions, 1992 to 2001. Psychiatr Serv. 2005;56:671–7. - PubMed
    1. Kunen S, Niederhauser R, Smith PO, Morris JA, Marx BD. Race disparities in psychiatric rates in emergency departments. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005;73:116–26. - PubMed
    1. Regier DA, Narrow WE, Rae DS, Manderscheid RW, Locke BZ, Goodwin FK. The de facto US mental and addictive disorders service system. Epidemiologic catchment area prospective 1-year prevalence rates of disorders and services. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993;50:85–94. - PubMed