Assessment of intracranial arterial stenosis with multidetector row CT angiography: a postprocessing techniques comparison
- PMID: 20053812
- PMCID: PMC7964195
- DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1976
Assessment of intracranial arterial stenosis with multidetector row CT angiography: a postprocessing techniques comparison
Abstract
Background and purpose: It was demonstrated the some patients with stroke have intracranial stenosis of 50% or greater and the identification of intracranial arterial stenosis is extremely important in order to plan a correct therapeutical approach. The aim of this study was to assess the image quality and intertechnique agreement of various postprocessing methods in the detection of intracranial arterial stenosis.
Material and methods: Eighty-five patients who were studied by using a multidetector row CT scanner were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 2040 segments were examined in the 85 subjects. Intracranial vasculature was assessed by using MPR, CPR, MIP, and VR techniques. Two radiologists reviewed the CT images independently. Cohen weighted kappa statistic was applied to calculate interobserver agreement and for image accuracy for each reconstruction method. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were also calculated by using the consensus read as the reference.
Results: Two hundred fifteen (10.5%) stenosed artery segments were identified by the observers in consensus. The best intermethod kappa values between observers 1 and 2 were obtained by VR and MIP (kappa values of 0.878 and 0.861, respectively), whereas MPR provided the lowest value (kappa value of 0.282). VR showed a sensitivity for detecting stenosed segments of 88.8% and 91.6% for observers 1 and 2, respectively. The highest positive predictive value was also obtained by VR at 95% and 99% for observers 1 and 2, respectively. Image accuracy obtained by using VR was the highest among all reconstruction methods in both observers (185/255 and 177/255 for observers 1 and 2, respectively).
Conclusions: The results of our study suggest that VR and MIP techniques provide the best interobserver and intertechnique concordance in the analysis of intravascular cranial stenosis.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Multidetector-row CT angiography diagnostic sensitivity in evaluation of renal artery stenosis: comparison between multiple reconstruction techniques.J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007 Sep-Oct;31(5):712-6. doi: 10.1097/rct.0b013e31802fa903. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007. PMID: 17895781
-
Comparison between postprocessing techniques in the analysis of hepatic arteries using multi-detector-row computed tomography angiography.J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2011 Mar-Apr;35(2):174-80. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e318201f3be. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2011. PMID: 21412086
-
Proximal pulmonary vein stenosis detection in pediatric patients: value of multiplanar and 3-D VR imaging evaluation.Pediatr Radiol. 2013 Aug;43(8):929-36. doi: 10.1007/s00247-013-2647-8. Epub 2013 Mar 10. Pediatr Radiol. 2013. PMID: 23475282
-
Diagnostic sensitivity of multidetector-row spiral computed tomography angiography in the evaluation of type-II endoleaks and their source: comparison between axial scans and reformatting techniques.Acta Radiol. 2008 Jul;49(6):630-7. doi: 10.1080/02841850802060860. Acta Radiol. 2008. PMID: 18568554
-
Differences between MIP and MPR techniques in the carotid artery stenosis degree measurement. Evaluation using multi-detector-row CT angiograph.Minerva Cardioangiol. 2008 Feb;56(1):21-7. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2008. PMID: 18432165
Cited by
-
Comparison of high-resolution MRI with CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography for the evaluation of middle cerebral artery atherosclerotic steno-occlusive disease.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Oct;29(7):1491-8. doi: 10.1007/s10554-013-0237-3. Epub 2013 May 19. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013. PMID: 23686460
-
CT Angiography in Evaluating Large-Vessel Occlusion in Acute Anterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke: Factors Associated with Diagnostic Error in Clinical Practice.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020 Apr;41(4):607-611. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6469. Epub 2020 Mar 12. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020. PMID: 32165362 Free PMC article.
-
A Comparative Study of AI-Based Automated and Manual Postprocessing of Head and Neck CT Angiography: An Independent External Validation with Multi-Vendor and Multi-Center Data.Neuroradiology. 2024 Oct;66(10):1765-1780. doi: 10.1007/s00234-024-03379-y. Epub 2024 May 16. Neuroradiology. 2024. PMID: 38753039
-
Semi-automatic quantitative measurements of intracranial internal carotid artery stenosis and calcification using CT angiography.Neuroradiology. 2012 Sep;54(9):919-27. doi: 10.1007/s00234-011-0998-0. Epub 2011 Dec 30. Neuroradiology. 2012. PMID: 22205339 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence, prognosis, and treatment of atherosclerotic intracranial stenosis in Caucasians.Int J Stroke. 2021 Apr;16(3):248-264. doi: 10.1177/1747493020974461. Epub 2020 Dec 3. Int J Stroke. 2021. PMID: 33270537 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Gibbs RGJ, Todd JC, Irvine C, et al. . Relationship between the regional and national incidence of transient ischaemic attack and stroke and performance of carotid endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Surg 1998;16:47–52 - PubMed
-
- Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Morality by cause for eight regions of the world: global burden of disease study. Lancet 1997;349:1269–76 - PubMed
-
- Goessens BMB, Visseren FLJ, Kappelle LJ, et al. . Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis and the risk of new vascular events in patients with manifest arterial disease. Stroke 2007;38:1470–75 - PubMed
-
- Lutsep HL, Clark WM. Association of intracranial stenosis with cortical symptoms or signs. Neurology 2000;55:716–18 - PubMed
-
- Boll DT, Lewin JS, Fleiter TR, et al. . Multidetector CT angiography of arterial inflow and runoff in the lower extremities: a challenge in data acquisition and evaluation. J Endovasc Ther 2004;11:144–51 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical