Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Mar;65(1):77-82.
doi: 10.1007/s11130-009-0149-5.

Nutrient based estimation of acid-base balance in vegetarians and non-vegetarians

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Nutrient based estimation of acid-base balance in vegetarians and non-vegetarians

Peter Deriemaeker et al. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2010 Mar.

Abstract

A first objective of the present study was to estimate the acid-base balance of the food intake in vegetarians and non-vegetarians. A second objective was to evaluate if additional input of specific food items on the existing potential renal acid load (PRAL) list was necessary for the comparison of the two dietary patterns. Thirty vegetarians between the age of 18 and 30 years were matched for sex, age and BMI with 30 non-vegetarians. Based on the 3-days food diaries the acid-base status of the food intake was estimated using the PRAL method. Mean PRAL values as estimated with the standard table yielded an alkaline load of -5.4 +/- 14.4 mEq/d in the vegetarians compared to an acid load of 10.3 +/- 14.4 mEq/d in the nonvegetarians (p<0.001). Mean PRAL values as estimated with the extended table yielded an alkaline load of -10.9 +/-19.7 mEq/d in the vegetarians compared to an acid load of 13.8 +/- 17.1 mEq/d for the non-vegetarians (p<0.001). The findings of this study indicate that vegetarian food intake produces more alkaline outcomes compared to non-vegetarian diets. The use of the standard PRAL table was sufficient for discrimination between the two diets.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eur J Nutr. 2001 Oct;40(5):231-7 - PubMed
    1. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998 Sep;68(3):576-83 - PubMed
    1. Proc Nutr Soc. 2006 Feb;65(1):35-41 - PubMed
    1. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002 Dec;76(6):1308-16 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Nutr. 2001 Oct;40(5):238-44 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources