Results of lumbar discectomy: a study using 15 different evaluation methods
- PMID: 20054942
- DOI: 10.1007/BF00302137
Results of lumbar discectomy: a study using 15 different evaluation methods
Abstract
Ninety-two patients who had undergone a primary excision of a lumbar disc were evaluated using 15 different criteria that evaluate the surgical outcome 2-15.5 years (average 8.8 years) following operation. The satisfactory results ranged from 62% to 84%. Criteria which relied on the subjective opinion of the patient gave the best results, while on the contrary the worst results were those that relied on functional criteria, such as return to work, return to previous employment, general activity level and need of further treatment. This variability in results observed with the same group of patients depends to a great extent on the nature of criteria used as well as on the design of those criteria. The study concludes that the reported outcomes for lumbar spinal surgery are influenced by the selection of the criteria used for the assessment of the end results.
Similar articles
-
How to predict return to work after lumbar discectomy: answers from the NeuroPoint-SD registry.J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Aug;25(2):181-6. doi: 10.3171/2015.10.SPINE15455. Epub 2016 Mar 18. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016. PMID: 26989977 Clinical Trial.
-
Asymptomatic same-site recurrent disc herniation after lumbar discectomy: results of a prospective longitudinal study with 2-year serial imaging.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Dec 1;36(25):2147-51. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182054595. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011. PMID: 21343849
-
Lumbar discectomy is associated with higher rates of lumbar fusion.Spine J. 2019 Mar;19(3):487-492. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.05.016. Epub 2018 May 21. Spine J. 2019. PMID: 29792995
-
Outcomes research and lumbar discectomy.Neurosurg Focus. 2002 Aug 15;13(2):E8. doi: 10.3171/foc.2002.13.2.9. Neurosurg Focus. 2002. PMID: 15916405 Review.
-
Lumbar total disc replacement. Surgical technique.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Mar;88 Suppl 1 Pt 1:50-64. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.01066. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006. PMID: 16510800 Review.
Cited by
-
A systematic review of bio-psychosocial risk factors for an unfavourable outcome after lumbar disc surgery.Eur Spine J. 2006 May;15(5):527-36. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-0910-x. Epub 2005 May 25. Eur Spine J. 2006. PMID: 15915334 Free PMC article.
-
Clinic-based training in comparison to home-based training after first-time lumbar disc surgery: a randomised controlled trial.Eur Spine J. 2009 Mar;18(3):398-409. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0826-3. Epub 2008 Nov 20. Eur Spine J. 2009. PMID: 19020904 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Validating the predictive precision of the dialogue support tool on Danish patient cohorts.N Am Spine Soc J. 2022 Dec 2;13:100188. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2022.100188. eCollection 2023 Mar. N Am Spine Soc J. 2022. PMID: 36579158 Free PMC article.
-
The efficacy of coblation nucleoplasty for protrusion of lumbar intervertebral disc at a two-year follow-up.Int Orthop. 2011 Nov;35(11):1677-82. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1196-0. Epub 2011 Jan 15. Int Orthop. 2011. PMID: 21240606 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Magnetic resonance imaging interpretation in patients with sciatica who are potential candidates for lumbar disc surgery.PLoS One. 2013 Jul 10;8(7):e68411. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068411. Print 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23874616 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical