Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with conventional tidal volumes for patients without acute lung injury: a preventive randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 20055989
- PMCID: PMC2875503
- DOI: 10.1186/cc8230
Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with conventional tidal volumes for patients without acute lung injury: a preventive randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Introduction: Recent cohort studies have identified the use of large tidal volumes as a major risk factor for development of lung injury in mechanically ventilated patients without acute lung injury (ALI). We compared the effect of conventional with lower tidal volumes on pulmonary inflammation and development of lung injury in critically ill patients without ALI at the onset of mechanical ventilation.
Methods: We performed a randomized controlled nonblinded preventive trial comparing mechanical ventilation with tidal volumes of 10 ml versus 6 ml per kilogram of predicted body weight in critically ill patients without ALI at the onset of mechanical ventilation. The primary end point was cytokine levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and plasma during mechanical ventilation. The secondary end point was the development of lung injury, as determined by consensus criteria for ALI, duration of mechanical ventilation, and mortality.
Results: One hundred fifty patients (74 conventional versus 76 lower tidal volume) were enrolled and analyzed. No differences were observed in lavage fluid cytokine levels at baseline between the randomization groups. Plasma interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels decreased significantly more strongly in the lower-tidal-volume group ((from 51 (20 to 182) ng/ml to 11 (5 to 20) ng/ml versus 50 (21 to 122) ng/ml to 21 (20 to 77) ng/ml; P = 0.01)). The trial was stopped prematurely for safety reasons because the development of lung injury was higher in the conventional tidal-volume group as compared with the lower tidal-volume group (13.5% versus 2.6%; P = 0.01). Univariate analysis showed statistical relations between baseline lung-injury score, randomization group, level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), the number of transfused blood products, the presence of a risk factor for ALI, and baseline IL-6 lavage fluid levels and the development of lung injury. Multivariate analysis revealed the randomization group and the level of PEEP as independent predictors of the development of lung injury.
Conclusions: Mechanical ventilation with conventional tidal volumes is associated with sustained cytokine production, as measured in plasma. Our data suggest that mechanical ventilation with conventional tidal volumes contributes to the development of lung injury in patients without ALI at the onset of mechanical ventilation.
Trial registration: ISRCTN82533884.
Figures







Similar articles
-
Mechanical ventilation with lower tidal volumes and positive end-expiratory pressure prevents pulmonary inflammation in patients without preexisting lung injury.Anesthesiology. 2008 Jan;108(1):46-54. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000296068.80921.10. Anesthesiology. 2008. PMID: 18156881 Clinical Trial.
-
Mechanical ventilation with high tidal volume induces inflammation in patients without lung disease.Crit Care. 2010;14(2):R39. doi: 10.1186/cc8919. Epub 2010 Mar 18. Crit Care. 2010. PMID: 20236550 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Mechanical ventilation with lower tidal volumes and positive end-expiratory pressure prevents alveolar coagulation in patients without lung injury.Anesthesiology. 2006 Oct;105(4):689-95. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200610000-00013. Anesthesiology. 2006. PMID: 17006066 Clinical Trial.
-
Lung-protective mechanical ventilation with lower tidal volumes in patients not suffering from acute lung injury: a review of clinical studies.Med Sci Monit. 2008 Feb;14(2):RA22-26. Med Sci Monit. 2008. PMID: 18227773 Review.
-
Acute lung injury in thoracic surgery.Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2013 Feb;26(1):40-6. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32835c4ea2. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2013. PMID: 23235524 Review.
Cited by
-
Mechanical ventilation of patients with and without ARDS: how far have we come?Respir Care. 2013 Apr;58(4):712-4. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02384. Respir Care. 2013. PMID: 23564874 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Initiation of a Lung Protective Ventilation Strategy in the Emergency Department: Does an Emergency Department-Based ICU Make a Difference?Crit Care Explor. 2022 Feb 8;4(2):e0632. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000632. eCollection 2022 Feb. Crit Care Explor. 2022. PMID: 35156050 Free PMC article.
-
Implementation of an ED-based bundled mechanical ventilation protocol improves adherence to lung-protective ventilation.Am J Emerg Med. 2021 May;43:186-194. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.02.053. Epub 2020 Feb 25. Am J Emerg Med. 2021. PMID: 32139215 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Lung-protective ventilation for SAH patients: are these measures truly protective?Neurocrit Care. 2014 Oct;21(2):175-7. doi: 10.1007/s12028-014-0058-9. Neurocrit Care. 2014. PMID: 25208682 No abstract available.
-
Ventilator-induced Lung Injury.Clin Chest Med. 2016 Dec;37(4):633-646. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Oct 14. Clin Chest Med. 2016. PMID: 27842744 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Dreyfuss D, Saumon G. Ventilator-induced lung injury: lessons from experimental studies. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;157:294–323. - PubMed
-
- Amato MB, Barbas CS, Medeiros DM, Magaldi RB, Schettino GP, Lorenzi-Filho G, Kairalla RA, Deheinzelin D, Munoz C, Oliveira R, Takagaki TY, Carvalho CR. Effect of a protective-ventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:347–354. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199802053380602. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical