Cervicomastoidfacial versus modified facelift incision for parotid surgery: a patient feedback comparison
- PMID: 20056059
- PMCID: PMC3024615
- DOI: 10.1308/003588410X12518836440009
Cervicomastoidfacial versus modified facelift incision for parotid surgery: a patient feedback comparison
Abstract
Introduction: Traditionally, the cervicomastoidfacial (CMF) incision is used to excise benign tumours of the parotid gland. The rhytidectomy or modified facelift (MF) incision allows an alternative approach which leaves no visible neck scar. The objective of this study was to establish the frequency of each surgical approach used and identify any difference in complication and patient satisfaction between the two incisions for benign conditions of the parotid gland.
Patients and methods: A retrospective analysis of 101 case notes for patients who underwent parotidectomy by both ENT and maxillofacial departments between January 2006 and February 2008 was undertaken. All histologically confirmed cases of malignancy were excluded. For each incision, immediate postoperative complications were obtained from the notes. A postal patient outcome evaluation questionnaire sought information regarding persistent and late complications as well as a visual analogue scar satisfaction score for both incisions.
Results: Overall, 79 parotidectomies were included (59 CMF incisions, 20 MF incisions). Of CMF incisions, 34% suffered facial weakness immediately postoperatively versus 20% of MF incisions. Of CMF incisions, 4% suffered postoperative haematomas versus none following MF incisions. In the study cohort, 47 (60%) responded to the postal feedback questionnaire (33 CMF versus 14 MF respondents). Information regarding immediate and late postoperative ipsilateral facial paraesthesia and gustatory sweating was obtained. Mean visual analogue scar satisfaction scores were 9.4 for CMF incisions and 8.9 for MF incisions.
Conclusions: Immediate and late complications for CMF and MF approaches for benign disease parotidectomy were comparable, but scar satisfaction following MF incision was not greater than CMF incisions.
Figures




Comment in
-
Facial surgical incisions--role of maxillofacial surgeons.Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010 Apr;92(3):267; author reply 267-8. doi: 10.1308/003588410x12664192075297. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010. PMID: 20412678 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Systematic review and meta-analysis of modified facelift incision versus modified Blair incision in parotidectomy.Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 16;11(1):24106. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03483-6. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34916561 Free PMC article.
-
Modified facelift incision for parotidectomy.J Laryngol Otol. 1994 Jul;108(7):574-8. doi: 10.1017/s002221510012746x. J Laryngol Otol. 1994. PMID: 7930893
-
Cervicomastoidfacial versus modified rhytidectomy incision for benign parotid tumors.Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Mar-Apr;79(2):168-72. doi: 10.5935/1808-8694.20130030. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2013. PMID: 23670321 Free PMC article.
-
Improving esthetic results in benign parotid surgery: statistical evaluation of facelift approach, sternocleidomastoid flap, and superficial musculoaponeurotic system flap application.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Apr;69(4):1235-41. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.03.005. Epub 2010 Aug 12. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011. PMID: 20708323
-
Facelift approach for parotidectomy: an evolving aesthetic technique.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Apr;148(4):548-56. doi: 10.1177/0194599812475221. Epub 2013 Feb 4. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013. PMID: 23380762 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of various surgical incisions in parotidectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 5;12:972498. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.972498. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35992792 Free PMC article.
-
Small access postaural parotidectomy: an analysis of techniques, feasibility and safety.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Jul;273(7):1879-83. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3691-9. Epub 2015 Jun 30. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016. PMID: 26122398 Free PMC article.
-
Modified facelift incision for partial parotidectomy versus bayonet-shaped incision: a comparison using visual analog scale.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Oct;273(10):3269-75. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3878-0. Epub 2016 Jan 9. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016. PMID: 26749559
-
The extended indication of parotidectomy using the modified facelift incision in benign lesions: retrospective analysis of a single institution.World J Surg. 2011 Oct;35(10):2228-37. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1209-1. World J Surg. 2011. PMID: 21858558
-
Systematic review and meta-analysis of modified facelift incision versus modified Blair incision in parotidectomy.Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 16;11(1):24106. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03483-6. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34916561 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bova R, Saylor A, Coman W. Parotidectomy: review of treatment and outcomes. Aust NZ J Surg. 2004;74:563–8. - PubMed
-
- Terris JD, Tuffo KM, Fee WE. Modified facelift incision for parotidectomy. J Laryngol Otol. 1994;108:574–8. - PubMed
-
- Appiani A. Surgical management of parotid tumours. Revista Argentina de Cirugia. 1967;21:236.
-
- Johns ME, Goldsmith MM. Incidence, diagnosis and classification of salivary gland tumours. Oncology. 1989;3:47–56. - PubMed
-
- Marshall AH, Quraishi SM, Bradley PJ. Patients' perspectives on the short and long term outcomes following surgery for benign parotid neoplasms. J Laryngol Otol. 2003;117:624–9. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous