Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jan;92(1):46-50.
doi: 10.1308/003588410X12518836440207.

The impact of the two-week wait rule on the diagnosis and management of bladder cancer in a single UK institution

Christopher Blick  1 , David Bailey, Neil Haldar, Amarjit Bdesha, John Kelleher, Asif Muneer
Affiliations

The impact of the two-week wait rule on the diagnosis and management of bladder cancer in a single UK institution

Christopher Blick et al. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010 Jan.

Abstract

Introduction: The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of the 2-week wait rule on patient waiting times for the diagnosis and treatment of bladder cancer.

Patients and methods: Data reporting the waiting times from diagnosis to treatment for 100 consecutive patients newly diagnosed with bladder cancer immediately before and after the implementation of the 2-week wait rule were compared. The data were collected both prospectively and retrospectively from cancer multidisciplinary team meeting files and patient records. Various steps of the patient pathway were analysed including waiting times from referral to consultation as well as time to investigation and first treatment. Data were also analysed based upon tumour stage/grade and whether referrals were made on an urgent or routine basis.

Results: One hundred newly diagnosed patients with bladder cancer in each group covered a period of 4-5 years (1997-2001 and 2001-2006). Following the introduction of the 2-week wait rule, there was a 47.6% reduction in the time from referral to first consultation with a specialist (42 days vs 22 days; P < 0.001). The time between first investigation and treatment has not reduced significantly. We also found that, despite the introduction of the 2-week wait rule, only 42% of the patients were diagnosed with bladder cancer using this pathway. Patients referred as 'routine' waited longer to be seen in hospital although there was no significant delay in receiving treatment.

Conclusions: The introduction of the 2-week wait rule has significantly reduced the time patients with bladder cancer wait for their first consultation with a specialist. However, there is no significant change in the time between first consultation and treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The patient pathway for newly diagnosed bladder cancer.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) A comparison of waiting times from referral to first consultation with a specialist between the pre and post 2001 patients. (B) A comparison of waiting times from first consultation and TURBT between the pre and post 2001 patients. (C) A comparison of waiting times from TURBT and discussion at MDT between pre and post 2001 patients. (D) A comparison of waiting times from referral to MDT discussion between pre and post 2001 patients.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A comparison between waiting times for post 2001 patients depending whether the referral was urgent or routine.
Figure 4
Figure 4
A comparison of waiting times depending upon tumour type.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Office of National Statistics, editor. Cancer Statistics registrations: registrations of cancer diagnosed in 2004, England, Series MB1 no 35. London: Office of National Statistics; 2007.
    1. May M, Helke C, Nitzke T, Vogler H, Hoschke B. Survival rates after radical cystectomy according to tumor stage of bladder carcinoma at first presentation. Urol Int. 2004;72:103–11. - PubMed
    1. Rosario DJ, Becker M, Anderson JB. The changing pattern of mortality and morbidi ty from radical cystectomy. BJU Int. 2000;85:427–30. - PubMed
    1. Department of Health, editor. The NHS Cancer Plan. London: Stationary Office; 2000.
    1. Boman H, Hedelin H, Holmang S. The results of routine evaluation of adult patients with haematuria analysed according to referral form information with 2-year follow-up. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2001;35:497–501. - PubMed