Clean Olympians? Doping and anti-doping: the views of talented young British athletes
- PMID: 20056401
- DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2009.11.009
Clean Olympians? Doping and anti-doping: the views of talented young British athletes
Abstract
Background: Review articles suggest a small but significant proportion (between 3 and 12%) of male adolescents have used anabolic-androgenic steroids (AAS) at some point (Yesalis and Bahrke, 2000; Calfee and Fadale, 2006). In sport, the use of prohibited substances or processes to enhance performance, collectively referred to as 'doping', is banned by both sports' National and International Governing Bodies, and by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) who run an extensive testing programme and educational initiatives designed to foster anti-doping attitudes.
Method: A total of 40 talented male and female athletes (mean average age 19.6 years) from 13 different sports attended 12 focus groups held over the UK intended to investigate athletes' attitudes toward doping. Focus group transcriptions were analysed and coded with the use of QSR NVivo 8.
Results: Athletes in general did not report a significant national doping problem in their sport, but exhibited sporting xenophobia with regard to both doping practices and the stringency of testing procedures outside of the UK. Athletes often viewed doping as 'unnatural' and considered the shame associated with doping to be a significant deterrent. Athletes perceived no external pressure to use performance enhancing drugs. In response to hypothetical questions, however, various factors were acknowledged as potential 'pressure' points: most notably injury recovery and the economic pressures of elite sport. Finally, a significant minority of athletes entertained the possibility of taking a banned hypothetical performance enhancing drug under conditions of guaranteed success and undetectability.
Conclusions: The athletes in this study generally embraced those values promoted in anti-doping educational programmes, although there were some notable exceptions. That the social emotion of shame was considered a significant deterrent suggests anti-doping efforts that cultivate a shared sense of responsibility to remain 'clean' and emphasise the social sanctions associated with being deemed a 'drugs cheat', resonate with this atypical social group.
Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Doping in sport: a review of elite athletes' attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge.Sports Med. 2013 Jun;43(6):395-411. doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0037-x. Sports Med. 2013. PMID: 23532595 Review.
-
The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use of the performance-enhancing drugs.Acta Biomed. 2022 Jan 19;92(6):e2021401. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92i6.12377. Acta Biomed. 2022. PMID: 35075058 Free PMC article.
-
Self-reported attitudes of elite athletes towards doping: differences between type of sport.Int J Sports Med. 2006 Oct;27(10):842-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-872969. Epub 2006 Feb 1. Int J Sports Med. 2006. PMID: 16586338
-
An (un)desirable trade of harms? How elite athletes might react to medically supervised 'doping' and their considerations of side-effects in this situation.Int J Drug Policy. 2018 May;55:14-30. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.12.019. Epub 2018 Feb 22. Int J Drug Policy. 2018. PMID: 29477956
-
A conceptual framework for achieving performance enhancing drug compliance in sport.Sports Med. 2002;32(4):269-84. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200232040-00005. Sports Med. 2002. PMID: 11929355 Review.
Cited by
-
Doping in sport: a review of elite athletes' attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge.Sports Med. 2013 Jun;43(6):395-411. doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0037-x. Sports Med. 2013. PMID: 23532595 Review.
-
Knowledge and experience of Kazakhstan athletes in anti-doping and the impact of past educational intervention.Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2022 Apr 26;17(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13011-022-00461-7. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2022. PMID: 35473576 Free PMC article.
-
Inside athletes' minds: preliminary results from a pilot study on mental representation of doping and potential implications for anti-doping.Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2011 May 20;6:10. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-6-10. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2011. PMID: 21599981 Free PMC article.
-
Profile of gym-goers who do not use performance-enhancement substances.Front Psychol. 2024 May 30;15:1357566. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1357566. eCollection 2024. Front Psychol. 2024. PMID: 38873513 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of West-Austrian junior athletes' knowledge regarding doping in sports.Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2013 Jan;125(1-2):41-9. doi: 10.1007/s00508-012-0318-7. Epub 2013 Jan 5. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2013. PMID: 23292645
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources