Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jan;118(1):116-9.
doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901196.

National use of asbestos in relation to economic development

Affiliations

National use of asbestos in relation to economic development

Giang Vinh Le et al. Environ Health Perspect. 2010 Jan.

Abstract

Background: National disparities in asbestos use will likely lead to an unequal burden of asbestos diseases.

Objectives: As economic status may be linked to asbestos use, we assessed, globally, the relationship between indicators of national economic development and asbestos use.

Methods: For the 135 countries that have ever used asbestos, per capita asbestos use (kilograms per capita per year) was compared with per capita gross domestic product (GDP) in 1990 Geary-Khamis dollars (GKD) for the period 1920-2003. Countries were grouped into three income levels (high, middle, and low) that were adapted from the 2003 World Bank categories.

Results: The historical pattern of asbestos use followed the environmental Kuznets curve in which use by high-income countries peaked when incomes attained 10,000-15,000 GKD and essentially ceased at income levels over 20,000 GKD. Currently, middle- and low-income countries are increasing their use of asbestos, closely following the paths once traced by higher income countries.

Conclusions: Developing countries have the opportunity to eliminate asbestos use sooner than high-income countries and thus reduce the future burden of asbestos diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Asbestos use versus GDP in the world.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Asbestos use versus GDP by income level groups. Symbols: ×, data point that cannot be connected with line graph because of presence of adjacent data point with value < 0.05 kg per capita; *, no data or data < 0.05 kg per capita because of ban. Looping patterns occur when asbestos use and income status reversed trends during the time course.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andreoni J, Levinson A. The simple analytics of the environmental Kuznets curve. J Public Econ. 2001;80:269–286.
    1. Antao VC, Pinheiro GA, Wassell JT. Asbestosis mortality in the USA: facts and predictions. Occup Environ Med. 2009;66:335–338. - PubMed
    1. Concha–Barrientos M, Nelson DI, Driscoll T, Steenland NK, Punnett L, Fingerhut MA, et al. Comparative Quantification of Health Risks: Global and Regional Burden of Diseases Attributable to Selected Major Risk Factors. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004. Selected occupational risk factors; pp. 1651–1801.
    1. Driscoll T, Nelson DI, Steenland K, Leigh J, Concha–Barrientos M, Fingerhut M, et al. The global burden of disease due to occupational carcinogens. Am J Ind Med. 2005a;48:419–431. - PubMed
    1. Driscoll T, Nelson DI, Steenland K, Leigh J, Concha–Barrientos M, Fingerhut M, et al. The global burden of non–malignant respiratory disease due to occupational airborne exposures. Am J Ind Med. 2005b;48:432–445. - PubMed

Publication types