Comparison of endoscopic and radiological residual fragment rate following percutaneous nephrolithotripsy
- PMID: 2005682
- DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38429-x
Comparison of endoscopic and radiological residual fragment rate following percutaneous nephrolithotripsy
Abstract
The stone-free rate after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is primarily determined by a plain abdominal radiograph alone. However, the accuracy of that assessment can be challenged by renal tomography and flexible nephroscopy. We report on 29 patients with large renal calculi treated with a combination of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and ESWL. Stone-free rates were determined by plain abdominal radiograph, renal tomography and flexible nephroscopy. The plain abdominal radiograph and renal tomography overestimated stone-free rates by 35% and 17%, respectively, compared to flexible nephroscopy. To determine stone-free rates after ESWL renal tomography is superior to a plain abdominal radiograph alone. Also, among patients with large renal calculi the use of the flexible nephroscope markedly improves the stone-free rate.
Similar articles
-
Sensitivity of noncontrast helical computerized tomography and plain film radiography compared to flexible nephroscopy for detecting residual fragments after percutaneous nephrostolithotomy.J Urol. 1999 Jul;162(1):23-6. doi: 10.1097/00005392-199907000-00006. J Urol. 1999. PMID: 10379731 Clinical Trial.
-
Prospective comparison of plain abdominal radiography with conventional and digital renal tomography in assessing renal extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy patients.J Urol. 1990 Dec;144(6):1341-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39735-5. J Urol. 1990. PMID: 2231921
-
Lower caliceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: the impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy.J Urol. 1998 Mar;159(3):676-82. J Urol. 1998. PMID: 9474124
-
Evolution of the technique of combination therapy for staghorn calculi: a decreasing role for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.J Urol. 1992 Sep;148(3 Pt 2):1058-62. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36816-7. J Urol. 1992. PMID: 1507330 Review.
-
Treatment of renal stones by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.Nephron. 1999;81 Suppl 1:71-81. doi: 10.1159/000046302. Nephron. 1999. PMID: 9873218 Review.
Cited by
-
The recurrence rate of stones following ESWL.World J Urol. 1993;11(1):26-30. doi: 10.1007/BF00182167. World J Urol. 1993. PMID: 8490664 Review.
-
What is the fate of insignificant residual fragment following percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric patients with anomalous kidney? A comparison with normal kidney.Urolithiasis. 2018 Jun;46(3):285-290. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-0980-3. Epub 2017 May 6. Urolithiasis. 2018. PMID: 28478480
-
Residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.Balkan Med J. 2012 Sep;29(3):230-5. doi: 10.5152/balkanmedj.2012.082. Epub 2012 Sep 1. Balkan Med J. 2012. PMID: 25207006 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Predictive factors for success after supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an analysis of 961 patients.Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2022 Jun 24;68(6):780-784. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20211340. eCollection 2022. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2022. PMID: 35766691 Free PMC article.
-
[Minimally invasive PCNL (mini-perc). Alternative treatment modality or replacement of conventional PCNL?].Urologe A. 2008 May;47(5):563-8. doi: 10.1007/s00120-008-1708-3. Urologe A. 2008. PMID: 18373077 German.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical