Guidelines for the appropriate use of do-not-resuscitate orders. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association
- PMID: 2005737
Guidelines for the appropriate use of do-not-resuscitate orders. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association
Abstract
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is routinely performed on hospitalized patients who suffer cardiac or respiratory arrest. Consent to administer CPR is presumed since the patient is incapable at the moment of arrest of communicating his or her treatment preference, and failure to act immediately is certain to result in the patient's death. Two exceptions to the presumption favoring CPR have been recognized, however. First, a patient may express in advance his or her preference that CPR be withheld. If the patient is incapable of expressing a preference, the decision to forgo resuscitation may be made by the patient's family or other surrogate decision maker. Second, CPR may be withheld if, in the judgment of the treating physician, an attempt to resuscitate the patient would be futile. In December 1987, the American Medical Association's Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs issued a series of guidelines to assist hospital medical staffs in formulating appropriate resuscitation policies. The Council's position on the appropriate use of CPR and do-not-resuscitate orders is updated in this report.
Comment in
-
Questions about DNR orders.JAMA. 1991 Aug 14;266(6):794-5. JAMA. 1991. PMID: 1865519 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The do-not-resuscitate order. Ethical and legal imperative or medical decision?Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 Mar;143(3):665-74. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/143.3.665. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991. PMID: 2001081 Review.
-
Family consent to orders not resuscitate. Reconsidering hospital policy.JAMA. 1990 Sep 12;264(10):1281-3. JAMA. 1990. PMID: 2388380
-
Decisions near the end of life. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association.JAMA. 1992 Apr 22-29;267(16):2229-33. JAMA. 1992. PMID: 1372944 No abstract available.
-
Futile medical treatment and patient consent.Cleve Clin J Med. 1993 Mar-Apr;60(2):151-4. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.60.2.151. Cleve Clin J Med. 1993. PMID: 8443948 Review.
-
Trends from the United States with end of life decisions in the intensive care unit.Intensive Care Med. 1993;19(6):316-22. doi: 10.1007/BF01694704. Intensive Care Med. 1993. PMID: 8227721 Review.
Cited by
-
Use of a standardized code status explanation by residents among hospitalized patients.J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2014 Apr 14;4(2). doi: 10.3402/jchimp.v4.23745. eCollection 2014. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2014. PMID: 24765258 Free PMC article.
-
Incidence of and Risk Factors for Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders in Critically Ill Children: Insights From a Tertiary Care Center in Saudi Arabia.Crit Care Res Pract. 2025 Jul 2;2025:9948312. doi: 10.1155/ccrp/9948312. eCollection 2025. Crit Care Res Pract. 2025. PMID: 40689199 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring the Changes in Code Status During the COVID-19 Pandemic and the Implications for Future Pandemic Care.Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022 Nov;39(11):1364-1370. doi: 10.1177/10499091221092699. Epub 2022 Apr 22. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022. PMID: 35452316 Free PMC article.
-
More than one in three proxies do not know their loved one's current code status: An observational study in a Maryland ICU.PLoS One. 2019 Jan 30;14(1):e0211531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211531. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 30699212 Free PMC article.
-
Judgments of futility: what should ethics committees be thinking about?HEC Forum. 1991;3(4):201-10. doi: 10.1007/BF00057807. HEC Forum. 1991. PMID: 10112516 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources