Comparison of the effects of two resistance training regimens on muscular and bone responses in premenopausal women
- PMID: 20057999
- DOI: 10.1007/s00198-009-1139-z
Comparison of the effects of two resistance training regimens on muscular and bone responses in premenopausal women
Abstract
Summary: A 28-week resistance training with linear periodization was compared with an undulating model in 27 premenopausal women. In both groups, bone mineral density (BMD) was not changed but muscle strength increased, and there were changes in anthropometrical and muscle damage parameters, indicating that in this population, these models are similar concerning these variables.
Introduction: This study seeks to compare the effects of resistance training with undulating versus linear periodization on BMD, muscle strength, anthropometrical variables, and muscle damage parameters in premenopausal women.
Methods: Twenty-seven females (39.6 +/- 0.41 years, mean +/- standard error), without osteopenia or osteoporosis and without calcium supplementation, were randomly assigned either to a linear periodization group (LPG, n = 14) or to an undulating periodization group (UPG, n = 13). The subjects were trained three times a week for 28 weeks. Lumbar spine and femoral neck BMDs were measured through dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Maximal and submaximal dynamic muscle strengths were measured through the 1-RM and 20-RM tests, respectively. Anthropometrical (body mass, skinfolds, and perimeters) and muscle damage parameters were assessed through serum creatine kinase (CK) and delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS).
Results: BMD remained unchanged in both groups, despite significant increases in maximal (LPG, 37-73%; UPG, 40-70%) and submaximal (LPG, 82-114%; UPG, 70-102%) muscle strength. The perimeter of the distal thigh was increased (about 1.7 cm) in both groups. CK and DOMS were greater in the first mesocycle than in the subsequent ones. After the 1st training session in each mesocycle, 24 and 48 h CK was increased as compared to pretraining values.
Conclusions: The resistance training of 28 weeks increased muscle strength in both training groups with no difference in BMD or in the occurrence of muscle damage.
Similar articles
-
Strength training effects on bone mineral content and density in premenopausal women.Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Jul;40(7):1282-8. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31816bce8a. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008. PMID: 18580409 Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of resistance training on regional and total bone mineral density in premenopausal women: a randomized prospective study.J Bone Miner Res. 1995 Jul;10(7):1015-24. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650100705. J Bone Miner Res. 1995. PMID: 7484276 Clinical Trial.
-
The effects of power and strength training on bone mineral density in premenopausal women.J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2013 Aug;53(4):428-36. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2013. PMID: 23828291 Clinical Trial.
-
Maximal strength training improves musculoskeletal health in amphetamine users in clinical treatment.Osteoporos Int. 2018 Oct;29(10):2289-2298. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4623-5. Epub 2018 Jul 5. Osteoporos Int. 2018. PMID: 29978257 Clinical Trial.
-
Short-term Periodization Models: Effects on Strength and Speed-strength Performance.Sports Med. 2015 Oct;45(10):1373-86. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0355-2. Sports Med. 2015. PMID: 26133514 Review.
Cited by
-
Does frequency of resistance training affect tibial cortical bone density in older women? A randomized controlled trial.Osteoporos Int. 2013 Feb;24(2):623-32. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2000-3. Epub 2012 May 12. Osteoporos Int. 2013. PMID: 22581292 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of Single Versus Multiple Bouts of Resistance Training on Maximal Strength and Anaerobic Performance.J Hum Kinet. 2018 Jun 13;62:231-240. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2017-0122. eCollection 2018 Jun. J Hum Kinet. 2018. PMID: 29922394 Free PMC article.
-
Benefits and Limitations of Block Periodized Training Approaches to Athletes' Preparation: A Review.Sports Med. 2016 Mar;46(3):329-38. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0425-5. Sports Med. 2016. PMID: 26573916 Review.
-
The use of periodization in exercise prescriptions for inactive adults: A systematic review.Prev Med Rep. 2015 May 6;2:385-96. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.04.023. eCollection 2015. Prev Med Rep. 2015. PMID: 26844095 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effects of Periodization on Strength and Muscle Hypertrophy in Volume-Equated Resistance Training Programs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Sports Med. 2022 Jul;52(7):1647-1666. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01636-1. Epub 2022 Jan 19. Sports Med. 2022. PMID: 35044672
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials