Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Mar;55(3):754-60.
doi: 10.1007/s10620-009-1058-z.

Improving the quality of colorectal cancer screening: assessment of familial risk

Lynn F Butterly  1 , Martha Goodrich, Tracy Onega, Mary Ann Greene, Amitabh Srivastava, Randall Burt, Allen Dietrich
Affiliations

Improving the quality of colorectal cancer screening: assessment of familial risk

Lynn F Butterly et al. Dig Dis Sci. 2010 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Accuracy of familial risk assessment by endoscopists in determining colonoscopic screening and surveillance intervals is unknown.

Aims: To investigate follow-up recommended by endoscopists for individuals at average or increased familial risk, following colonoscopies that were normal or yielded hyperplastic polyps only.

Methods: Colonoscopy registry data was analyzed on 5,982 patients who had colonoscopy between 2004 and 2006. Patient information was linked with colonoscopy procedure information and pathology results. Patients with a personal or family history of colorectal cancer (CRC) or polyps, inflammatory bowel disease, or who had diagnostic, incomplete or suboptimally prepped examinations were excluded. The final analysis, which included 2,414 patients, investigated concordance of risk assessment between patient and endoscopist, and resulting endoscopist follow-up recommendations.

Results: Following normal colonoscopy, 76% of average risk individuals were told to follow-up in 10 years, but if a hyperplastic polyp was found, less than 10 years was suggested for 76%. Many patients reporting a known familial cancer syndrome or a very strong family history did not have that history indicated on the endoscopist's procedure form, and recommended follow-up intervals were beyond guideline recommendations for 60.4% of the very high-risk group.

Conclusions: Endoscopists may sometimes be unaware of the presence of familial risk factors, even for individuals at very high familial risk. Greater consistency and accuracy in familial risk assessments could significantly increase the efficacy of screening in preventing colorectal cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Recommended follow-up intervals based on agreement between patient report and colonoscopist’s documentation of family history (Figure does not include patients with HNPCC or FAP)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57(1):43–66. - PubMed
    1. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. The National Polyp Study Workgroup Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(27):1977–1981. - PubMed
    1. Lang CA, Ransohoff DF. Fecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer. Is mortality reduced by chance selection for screening colonoscopy? Jama. 1994;271(13):1011–1013. - PubMed
    1. Byers T, Levin B, Rothenberger D, Dodd GD, Smith RA, American Cancer Society Detection and Treatment Advisory Group on Colorectal Cancer American Cancer Society guidelines for screening and surveillance for early detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: update 1997. CA Cancer J Clin. 1997;47(3):154–160. - PubMed
    1. Seeff LC, Richards TB, Shapiro JA, et al. How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC’s survey of endoscopic capacity. Gastroenterology. 2004;127(6):1670–1677. - PubMed

Publication types