The profile of multiple- versus single-operated patients at the time of their first operation for lumbar disc herniation
- PMID: 20058409
- DOI: 10.1007/BF00299450
The profile of multiple- versus single-operated patients at the time of their first operation for lumbar disc herniation
Abstract
A retrospective study was carried out on a total of 491 patients (294 male, 197 female) who underwent surgery between 1 January 1980 and 31 December 1986. They were treated by minimal intervention lumbar discectomy without the use of a microscope. The patient groups consisted of 241 patients who needed a second operation (MOP, multiple operations) and another 250 patients who needed only one surgical procedure (SOP, single operation) and the whole treatment period was between 1 January 1980 and 31 December 1990. The SOP patients served as control group. The MOP and SOP groups were compared in the search for clinical and/or morphological parameters which might distinguish the two groups at the time of first operation.
Results: In terms of history, age, sex distribution, pre-operative treatment and severity of neurological symptoms there was no statistical difference between the two groups at the time of the first operation. Radiological examinations were more extensive but less conclusive in the MOP group. In the SOP patients, subligamentous and epidural disc fragments occurred in 67.2% of patients. In the MOP patients disc protrusions or small subligamentous extrusions were predominant (50.1%) at the time of the first operation. Osteochondritic changes occurred less frequently in the MOP (39.1% vs 53.6%). There were significantly more two-level approaches in the MOP patients (31.5% vs 14.4%); also, the surgical technique in the MOP group was less invasive, often being 'explorative' in character. Post-operative morbidity was higher, improvement of neurological symptoms was slower and the overall result was worse in MOP patients after the first operation. Interpretation of radiological findings, disc morphology and surgical technique are usually considered factors influencing the outcome of disc surgery. At the second operation (MOP 2) there were epidural scars in 48.4% of patients and the incidence of disc fragments containing parts of the end-plate increased from 10.1% to 61.9%. The prognosis was worse in patients with mild pre-operative disc degeneration.
Similar articles
-
Retrolisthesis and lumbar disc herniation: a postoperative assessment of outcomes at 8-year follow-up.Spine J. 2019 Jun;19(6):995-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.12.010. Epub 2018 Dec 27. Spine J. 2019. PMID: 30594668
-
Long-term outcomes of standard discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a follow-up study of more than 10 years.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Mar 15;26(6):652-7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200103150-00019. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001. PMID: 11246379
-
[Assessment of the correlation between histological degeneration and radiological and clinical parameters in a series of patients who underwent lumbar disc herniation surgery].Neurocirugia (Engl Ed). 2018 Mar-Apr;29(2):79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.neucir.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Sep 28. Neurocirugia (Engl Ed). 2018. PMID: 28967575 Spanish.
-
Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus microendoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis.Int Orthop. 2019 Apr;43(4):923-937. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4253-8. Epub 2018 Dec 13. Int Orthop. 2019. PMID: 30547214
-
Clinical and radiological results of lumbar microdiskectomy technique with preserving of ligamentum flavum comparing to the standard microdiskectomy technique.Surg Neurol. 2002 Jan;57(1):5-13; discussion 13-4. doi: 10.1016/s0090-3019(01)00677-2. Surg Neurol. 2002. PMID: 11834260 Review.
Cited by
-
A new classification of lumbar motion segments for microdiscotomy.Eur Spine J. 1995;4(6):327-34. doi: 10.1007/BF00300291. Eur Spine J. 1995. PMID: 8983650
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical