Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1993 Dec;2(4):223-9.
doi: 10.1007/BF00299450.

The profile of multiple- versus single-operated patients at the time of their first operation for lumbar disc herniation

Affiliations

The profile of multiple- versus single-operated patients at the time of their first operation for lumbar disc herniation

H M Mayer. Eur Spine J. 1993 Dec.

Abstract

A retrospective study was carried out on a total of 491 patients (294 male, 197 female) who underwent surgery between 1 January 1980 and 31 December 1986. They were treated by minimal intervention lumbar discectomy without the use of a microscope. The patient groups consisted of 241 patients who needed a second operation (MOP, multiple operations) and another 250 patients who needed only one surgical procedure (SOP, single operation) and the whole treatment period was between 1 January 1980 and 31 December 1990. The SOP patients served as control group. The MOP and SOP groups were compared in the search for clinical and/or morphological parameters which might distinguish the two groups at the time of first operation.

Results: In terms of history, age, sex distribution, pre-operative treatment and severity of neurological symptoms there was no statistical difference between the two groups at the time of the first operation. Radiological examinations were more extensive but less conclusive in the MOP group. In the SOP patients, subligamentous and epidural disc fragments occurred in 67.2% of patients. In the MOP patients disc protrusions or small subligamentous extrusions were predominant (50.1%) at the time of the first operation. Osteochondritic changes occurred less frequently in the MOP (39.1% vs 53.6%). There were significantly more two-level approaches in the MOP patients (31.5% vs 14.4%); also, the surgical technique in the MOP group was less invasive, often being 'explorative' in character. Post-operative morbidity was higher, improvement of neurological symptoms was slower and the overall result was worse in MOP patients after the first operation. Interpretation of radiological findings, disc morphology and surgical technique are usually considered factors influencing the outcome of disc surgery. At the second operation (MOP 2) there were epidural scars in 48.4% of patients and the incidence of disc fragments containing parts of the end-plate increased from 10.1% to 61.9%. The prognosis was worse in patients with mild pre-operative disc degeneration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Neurochirurgia (Stuttg). 1991 Mar;34(2):53-6 - PubMed
    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981 Jun;(157):191-9 - PubMed
    1. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1974 Aug;112(4):798-801 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979 Oct;61(7):1077-82 - PubMed
    1. Wien Med Wochenschr. 1984 Sep 30;134(18):399-402 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources