Differential introduction of DNA damage and repair in mammalian genes transcribed by RNA polymerases I and II
- PMID: 2005908
- PMCID: PMC359922
- DOI: 10.1128/mcb.11.4.2245-2252.1991
Differential introduction of DNA damage and repair in mammalian genes transcribed by RNA polymerases I and II
Abstract
We have developed a general quantitative method for comparing the levels of drug-induced DNA crosslinking in specific mammalian genes. We observed a dramatic difference between the efficiency of the removal of both psoralen monoadducts and interstrand crosslinks from the rRNA genes and the efficiency of their removal from the dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) gene in cultured human and hamster cells. While 90% of the interstand crosslinks were removed from the human DHFR gene in 48 h, less than 25% repair occurred in the rRNA genes. Similarly, in Chinese hamster ovary cells, 85% repair of interstrand crosslinks occurred within 8 h in the DHFR gene versus only 20% repair in the rRNA genes. The preferential repair of the DHFR gene relative to that of the rRNA genes was also observed for psoralen monoadducts in cells from both mammalian species. In human-mouse hybrid cells, the active mouse rRNA genes were five times more susceptible to psoralen modification than are the silent rRNA human genes, but adduct removal was similarly inefficient for both classes. We conclude that the repair of chemical damage such as psoralen photoadducts in an expressed mammalian gene may depend upon the class of transcription to which it belongs.
Similar articles
-
Repair of ribosomal RNA genes in hamster cells after UV irradiation, or treatment with cisplatin or alkylating agents.Carcinogenesis. 1993 Aug;14(8):1591-6. doi: 10.1093/carcin/14.8.1591. Carcinogenesis. 1993. PMID: 8353843
-
Selective DNA repair in active genes.Acta Biol Hung. 1990;41(1-3):77-91. Acta Biol Hung. 1990. PMID: 2094132 Review.
-
Differential repair and replication of damaged DNA in ribosomal RNA genes in different CHO cell lines.J Cell Biochem. 1990 Jun;43(2):173-83. doi: 10.1002/jcb.240430208. J Cell Biochem. 1990. PMID: 2380262
-
Selective removal of transcription-blocking DNA damage from the transcribed strand of the mammalian DHFR gene.Cell. 1987 Oct 23;51(2):241-9. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90151-6. Cell. 1987. PMID: 3664636
-
Preferential repair of damage in actively transcribed DNA sequences in vivo.Genome. 1989;31(2):605-11. doi: 10.1139/g89-113. Genome. 1989. PMID: 2698835 Review.
Cited by
-
Role of transcription-coupled DNA repair in susceptibility to environmental carcinogenesis.Environ Health Perspect. 1996 May;104 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):547-51. doi: 10.1289/ehp.96104s3547. Environ Health Perspect. 1996. PMID: 8781381 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cockayne syndrome: defective repair of transcription?EMBO J. 1997 Jul 16;16(14):4155-62. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.14.4155. EMBO J. 1997. PMID: 9250659 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Transcription-coupled repair in RNA polymerase I-transcribed genes of yeast.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jan 22;99(2):649-54. doi: 10.1073/pnas.022373099. Epub 2002 Jan 8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002. PMID: 11782531 Free PMC article.
-
Transcription-repair coupling and mutation frequency decline.J Bacteriol. 1993 Dec;175(23):7509-14. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.23.7509-7514.1993. J Bacteriol. 1993. PMID: 8244919 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Escherichia coli mfd mutant deficient in "mutation frequency decline" lacks strand-specific repair: in vitro complementation with purified coupling factor.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Dec 15;88(24):11574-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.24.11574. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991. PMID: 1763073 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources