Treatment of post-partum haemorrhage with sublingual misoprostol versus oxytocin in women receiving prophylactic oxytocin: a double-blind, randomised, non-inferiority trial
- PMID: 20060162
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61923-1
Treatment of post-partum haemorrhage with sublingual misoprostol versus oxytocin in women receiving prophylactic oxytocin: a double-blind, randomised, non-inferiority trial
Abstract
Background: Oxytocin, the gold-standard treatment for post-partum haemorrhage, needs refrigeration, intravenous infusion, and skilled providers for optimum use. Misoprostol, a potential alternative, is increasingly used ad hoc for treatment of post-partum haemorrhage; however, evidence is insufficient to lend support to recommendations for its use. This trial established whether sublingual misoprostol is non-inferior to intravenous oxytocin for treatment of post-partum haemorrhage in women receiving prophylactic oxytocin.
Methods: In this double-blind, non-inferiority trial, 31 055 women exposed to prophylactic oxytocin had blood loss measured after vaginal delivery at five hospitals in Burkina Faso, Egypt, Turkey, and Vietnam (two secondary-level and three tertiary-level facilities). 809 (3%) women were diagnosed with post-partum haemorrhage and were randomly assigned to receive 800 mug misoprostol (n=407) or 40 IU intravenous oxytocin (n=402). Providers and women were masked to treatment assignment. Primary endpoints were cessation of active bleeding within 20 min and additional blood loss of 300 mL or more after treatment. Clinical equivalence of misoprostol would be accepted if the upper bound of the 97.5% CI fell below the predefined non-inferiority margin of 6%. All outcomes were assessed from the time of initial treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00116350.
Findings: All randomly assigned participants were analysed. Active bleeding was controlled within 20 min after initial treatment for 363 (89%) women given misoprostol and 360 (90%) given oxytocin (relative risk [RR] 0.99, 95% CI 0.95-1.04; crude difference 0.4%, 95% CI -3.9 to 4.6). Additional blood loss of 300 mL or greater after treatment occurred for 139 (34%) women receiving misoprostol and 123 (31%) receiving oxytocin (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.92-1.37). Shivering (152 [37%] vs 59 [15%]; RR 2.54, 95% CI 1.95-3.32) and fever (88 [22%] vs 59 [15%]; 1.47, 1.09-1.99) were significantly more common with misoprostol than with oxytocin. Six women had hysterectomies and two women died.
Interpretation: Misoprostol is clinically equivalent to oxytocin when used to stop excessive post-partum bleeding suspected to be due to uterine atony in women who have received oxytocin prophylactically during the third stage of labour.
Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Post-partum haemorrhage: beyond the confrontation between misoprostol and oxytocin.Lancet. 2010 Jan 16;375(9710):176-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60066-9. Lancet. 2010. PMID: 20109901 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Treatment of post-partum haemorrhage with sublingual misoprostol versus oxytocin in women not exposed to oxytocin during labour: a double-blind, randomised, non-inferiority trial.Lancet. 2010 Jan 16;375(9710):210-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61924-3. Epub 2010 Jan 6. Lancet. 2010. PMID: 20060161 Clinical Trial.
-
Prevention of postpartum haemorrhage with sublingual misoprostol or oxytocin: a double-blind randomised controlled trial.BJOG. 2012 Jul;119(8):975-82; discussion 982-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03341.x. BJOG. 2012. PMID: 22703421 Clinical Trial.
-
Oxytocin via Uniject (a prefilled single-use injection) versus oral misoprostol for prevention of postpartum haemorrhage at the community level: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Jan;4(1):e37-44. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00219-3. Lancet Glob Health. 2016. PMID: 26718808 Clinical Trial.
-
Prevention of postpartum hemorrhage with misoprostol.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007 Dec;99 Suppl 2:S198-201. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.09.012. Epub 2007 Oct 24. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007. PMID: 17961574 Review.
-
Comparison of the effects and side effects of misoprostol and oxytocin in the postpartum period: A systematic review.Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Nov;58(6):748-756. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2019.09.004. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 31759522
Cited by
-
Promptness of oxytocin administration for first-line treatment of postpartum hemorrhage: a national vignette-based study among midwives.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Apr 23;22(1):353. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04648-5. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022. PMID: 35461215 Free PMC article.
-
Patient blood management in obstetrics: prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage. A NATA consensus statement.Blood Transfus. 2019 Mar;17(2):112-136. doi: 10.2450/2019.0245-18. Epub 2019 Feb 6. Blood Transfus. 2019. PMID: 30865585 Free PMC article.
-
Testing a home-based model of care using misoprostol for prevention and treatment of postpartum hemorrhage: results from a randomized placebo-controlled trial conducted in Badakhshan province, Afghanistan.Reprod Health. 2020 Jun 5;17(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-00933-8. Reprod Health. 2020. PMID: 32503556 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The Effect of Combined Oxytocin-Misoprostol Versus Oxytocin and Misoprostol Alone in Reducing Blood Loss at Cesarean Delivery: A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Study.J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2015 Dec;65(6):376-81. doi: 10.1007/s13224-014-0607-3. Epub 2015 Jan 24. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2015. PMID: 26663995 Free PMC article.
-
Intravenous versus intramuscular prophylactic oxytocin for the third stage of labour.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 9;11(11):CD009332. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009332.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33169839 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical