Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Feb;125(2 Suppl 2):S272-83.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.09.045. Epub 2010 Jan 12.

Immune responses to malignancies

Affiliations
Review

Immune responses to malignancies

Theresa L Whiteside. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Feb.

Abstract

Immune responses to tumor-associated antigens (TAs) are often detectable in tumor-bearing hosts, but they fail to eliminate malignant cells or prevent the development of metastases. Patients with cancer generate robust immune responses to infectious agents (bacteria and viruses) perceived as a "danger signal" but only ineffective weak responses to TAs, which are considered as "self." This fundamental difference in responses to self versus nonself is further magnified by the ability of tumors to subvert the host immune system. Tumors induce dysfunction and apoptosis in CD8(+) antitumor effector cells and promote expansion of regulatory T cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, or both, which downregulate antitumor immunity, allowing tumors to escape from the host immune system. The tumor escape is mediated by several distinct molecular mechanisms. Recent insights into these mechanisms encourage expectations that a more effective control of tumor-induced immune dysfunction will be developed in the near future. Novel strategies for immunotherapy of cancer are aimed at the protection and survival of antitumor effector cells and also of central memory T cells in the tumor microenvironment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure of potential conflict of interest. T. L. Whiteside has declared that she has no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Effects of the tumor on immune cells. In the tumor microenvironment an excess of immunoinhibitory factors favors the generation and expansion of TH2-type T cells and Treg cells ather than CTLs and TH1-type effector cells. The downregulation of MHC molecules and defects in the APM components in DCs, as well as the immunosuppressive effects of accumulating MDSCs on DC maturation and function, contributes to the polarization of immune responses toward tolerance and away from immunity. The balance between stimulatory and suppressive responses shifts in favor of suppression as the tumor grows. Immune therapies are expected to shift this balance back to TH1-type responses, which promote expansion of CD4+ TH1 cells producing IFN-γ and IL-2, as well as CD8+ CTLs. IDO, Indoleamine 2,3-deoxygenase.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Romero P, Cerottini JC, Speiser DE. The human T cell response to melanoma antigens. Adv Immunol. 2006;92:187–224. - PubMed
    1. Dunn GP, Koebel CM, Schreiber RD. Interferons, immunity and cancer immunoediting. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6:836–48. - PubMed
    1. Zhang L, Zhou W, Velculescu VE, Kern SE, Hruban RH, Hamilton SR, et al. Gene expression profiles in normal and cancer cells. Science. 1997;276:1268–72. - PubMed
    1. Dunn GP, Bruce AT, Ikeda H, Old LJ, Schreiber RD. Cancer immunoediting: from immunosurveillance to tumor escape. Nat Immunol. 2002;3:991–8. - PubMed
    1. Whiteside TL. The tumor microenvironment and its role in promoting tumor growth. Oncogene. 2008;27:5904–12. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types