Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and open lumbar microdiscectomy for recurrent disc herniation
- PMID: 20062565
- PMCID: PMC2803265
- DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2009.46.6.515
Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and open lumbar microdiscectomy for recurrent disc herniation
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) and open lumbar microdiscectomy (OLM) for recurrent disc herniation.
Methods: Fifty-four patients, who underwent surgery, either PELD (25 patients) or repeated OLM (29 patients), due to recurrent disc herniation at L4-5 level, were divided into two groups according to the surgical methods. Excluded were patients with sequestrated disc, calcified disc, severe neurological deficit, or instability. Clinical outcomes were assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Radiological variables were assessed using plain radiography and/or magnetic resonance imaging.
Results: Mean operating time and hospital stay were significantly shorter in PELD group (45.8 minutes and 0.9 day, respectively) than OLM group (73.8 minutes and 3.8 days, respectively) (p < 0.001). Complications occurred in 4% in PELD group and 10.3% in OLM group in the perioperative period. At a mean follow-up duration of 34.2 months, the mean improvements of back pain, leg pain, and functional improvement were 4.0, 5.5, and 40.9% for PELD group and 2.3, 5.1, and 45.0% for OLM group, respectively. Second recurrence occurred in 4% after PELD and 10.3% after OLM. Disc height did not change after PELD, but significantly decreased after OLM (p = 0.0001). Neither sagittal rotation angle nor volume of multifidus muscle changed significantly in both groups.
Conclusion: Both PELD and repeated OLM showed favorable outcomes for recurrent disc herniation, but PELD had advantages in terms of shorter operating time, hospital stay, and disc height preservation.
Keywords: Discectomy; Lumbar spine; Reherniation.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy as an Alternative to Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy for Large Lumbar Disc Herniation.Pain Physician. 2016 Feb;19(2):E291-300. Pain Physician. 2016. PMID: 26815256
-
Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus open lumbar microdiscectomy for treating lumbar disc herniation: Using the survival analysis.Tzu Chi Med J. 2023 Feb 13;35(3):237-241. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_262_22. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep. Tzu Chi Med J. 2023. PMID: 37545800 Free PMC article.
-
A matched comparison of outcomes between percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and open lumbar microdiscectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a 2-year retrospective cohort study.Spine J. 2021 Jan;21(1):114-121. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.07.005. Epub 2020 Jul 16. Spine J. 2021. PMID: 32683107
-
Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus microendoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis.Int Orthop. 2019 Apr;43(4):923-937. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4253-8. Epub 2018 Dec 13. Int Orthop. 2019. PMID: 30547214
-
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Versus Posterior Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy for the Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.World Neurosurg. 2018 Dec;120:352-362. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.236. Epub 2018 Sep 8. World Neurosurg. 2018. PMID: 30205219
Cited by
-
Factors affecting return to work following endoscopic lumbar foraminal stenosis surgery: A single-center series.Surg Neurol Int. 2023 Nov 24;14:408. doi: 10.25259/SNI_659_2023. eCollection 2023. Surg Neurol Int. 2023. PMID: 38053695 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical efficacy of single intraoperative 500 mg methylprednisolone management therapy for thoracic myelopathy caused by ossification of the ligamentum flavum.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Mar 19;21(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03216-2. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020. PMID: 32192476 Free PMC article.
-
Current Indications for Spinal Endoscopic Surgery and Potential for Future Expansion.Neurospine. 2023 Mar;20(1):33-42. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346190.095. Epub 2023 Mar 31. Neurospine. 2023. PMID: 37016852 Free PMC article.
-
Is Endoscopic Discectomy the Next Gold Standard in the Management of Lumbar Disc Disease? Systematic Review and Superiority Analysis.Global Spine J. 2021 Sep;11(7):1104-1120. doi: 10.1177/2192568220948814. Epub 2020 Sep 16. Global Spine J. 2021. PMID: 32935576 Free PMC article.
-
CORR Insights®: Elderly Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion May Have Similar Clinical Outcomes, Perioperative Complications, and Fusion Rates As Their Younger Counterparts.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Apr;478(4):833-835. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001175. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020. PMID: 32097129 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Ahn Y, Lee SH, Park WM, Lee HY, Shin SW, Kang HY. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for recurrent disc herniation : surgical technique, outcome, and prognostic factors of 43 consecutive cases. Spine. 2004;29:E326–E332. - PubMed
-
- Carragee EJ, Spinnickie AO, Alamin TF, Paragioudakis S. A prospective controlled study of limited versus subtotal posterior discectomy : short-term outcomes in patients with herniated lumbar intervertebral discs and large posterior annular defect. Spine. 2006;31:653–657. - PubMed
-
- Carreon LY, Puno RM, Dimar JR, 2nd, Glassman SD, Johnson JR. Perioperative complications of posterior lumbar decompression and arthrodesis in older adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:2089–2092. - PubMed
-
- Choi G, Raiturker PP, Kim MJ, Chung DJ, Chae YS, Lee SH. The effect of early isolated lumbar extension exercise program for patients with herniated disc undergoing lumbar discectomy. Neurosurgery. 2005;57:764–772. discussion 764-772. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources