Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jan;35(1):135-41.
doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0932-9. Epub 2010 Jan 9.

The effect of an intramedullary implant with a static magnetic field on the healing of the osteotomised rabbit femur

Affiliations

The effect of an intramedullary implant with a static magnetic field on the healing of the osteotomised rabbit femur

Nuri Aydin et al. Int Orthop. 2011 Jan.

Abstract

Static magnetic fields are a type of electromagnetic fields used in clinical practice. To ascertain what effect a static magnetic intramedullary device implanted in the rabbit femur had on fracture healing, 20 male New Zealand white rabbits with magnetic/nonmagnetic intramedullary implants were examined histologically, radiologically and for bone mineral density. Three groups were constituted according to the poles of the magnets. During surgery the intramedullary device was driven into the medulla. A femoral osteotomy was created with a mini Gigli wire at the centre point of the rod. Radiographs were obtained at the second and fourth weeks. Histological examination and bone mineral density were evaluated at the fourth week. The results of this study verified that an intramedullary implant with a static magnetic field improves bone healing in the first two weeks radiologically and that the configuration difference in magnetic poles has an effect on bone quality. Static magnetic fields have minor effects on bone mineral density values.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Technical drawings of the intramedullar rods in group 1 (a), group 2 (b), and group 3 (c)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Illustration of the implanted rods
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Surgical implantation of the rods. a Drilling the medulla. b Implanting the rod. c Final position of the rod. d Osteotomy line
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
X-ray of the implanted femur in the second week (a) and fourth week (b)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Basset CAL, Mitchell SN, Gaston SR. Treatment of ununited tibial diaphyseal fractures with pulsing electromagnetic fields. J Bone Joint Surg. 1981;63:511–523. - PubMed
    1. Basset CAL, Mitchell SN, Hernandez E. Modification of fracture repair with selected pulsing electromagnetic fields. J Bone Joint Surg. 1982;64(A):888–895. - PubMed
    1. Bassett CAL. Beneficial effects of electromagnetic fields. J Cell Biochem. 1993;51:387–393. - PubMed
    1. Brighton CT, Friedenberg ZB, Mitchell EI, Booth RE. Treatment of nonunion with constant direct current. Clin Orthop. 1977;124:106–123. - PubMed
    1. Brighton CT, Solomon R, Pollack SR. Treatment of recalcitrant non-union with a capacitatively coupled electrical field. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67:577–585. - PubMed