Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jan;44(1):44-9.
doi: 10.1002/eat.20780.

An investigation of weight suppression in a population-based sample of female twins

Affiliations

An investigation of weight suppression in a population-based sample of female twins

Karen S Mitchell et al. Int J Eat Disord. 2011 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: Weight suppression (WS), maintaining a body weight below one's maximum adult weight, is associated with bingeing, purging, and weight gain in clinical samples.

Method: We investigated associations between eating disorder-related variables and WS and additive genetic (A), common (C), and unique (E) environmental contributions to WS in a population-based sample of 1,503 female adult twins.

Results: Modeling results were similar for participants reporting no binge eating (NBE) and those reporting binge eating plus loss of control (BE + LOC): 20-25% of the variance in WS was due to A and 70-75% due to E. Among NBE participants, restraint, drive for thinness, body dissatisfaction, and dieting during child/adulthood were related to WS. Restraint, disinhibition, and dieting during childhood were significantly associated with WS in the BE + LOC subsample.

Discussion: Although maintaining lower body weight could be advantageous, interventionists should take care when addressing weight suppression in individuals vulnerable to eating disorder symptomatology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A Biometric Model of Weight Suppression. Note: A=variance due to additive genetic influences, C=variance due to common environment, E= variance due to unique environment. AH, CH, EH = variance components for highest weight; AC, CC, EC = variance components for current weight. ah, ch, eh = parameters for highest weight; ac, cc, ec = parameters for current weight. ra, rc, re=genetic, common environmental, and unique environmental correlations between highest and current weight.

References

    1. Lowe MR. The effects of dieting on eating behavior: a three-factor model. Psychol Bull. 1993;114:100–121. - PubMed
    1. Butryn ML, Lowe MR, Safer DL, Agras WS. Weight suppression is a robust predictor of outcome in the cognitive-behavioral treatment of bulimia nervosa. J Abnorm Psychol. 2006;115:62–67. - PubMed
    1. Hedley AA, Ogden CL, Clifford JL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, Flegal KM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity among US children, adolescents, and adults. JAMA. 2004;291:2847–2850. - PubMed
    1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, McDowell MA, Tabak CJ, Flegal KM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999–2004. JAMA. 2006;295:1549–1555. - PubMed
    1. Herman CP, Mack D. Restrained and unrestrained eating. J Pers. 1975;43:647–660. - PubMed

Publication types