Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2010 Jan;136(1):12-6; discussion 17-20.
doi: 10.1037/a0017769.

Are alcohol expectancies associations? Comment on Moss and Albery (2009)

Affiliations
Comment

Are alcohol expectancies associations? Comment on Moss and Albery (2009)

Reinout W Wiers et al. Psychol Bull. 2010 Jan.

Abstract

Moss and Albery presented a dual-process model of the alcohol-behavior link, integrating alcohol expectancy and alcohol myopia theory. Their integrative theory rests on a number of assumptions including, first, that alcohol expectancies are associations that can be activated automatically by an alcohol-relevant context, and second, that alcohol selectively reduces propositional reasoning. As a result, behavior comes under the control of associative processes after alcohol consumption. We agree with the second but not with the first assumption, based on theoretical and empirical arguments. Although in some cases expectancies may involve a simple association, they are propositional in nature. We demonstrate that this assertion is supported by existing literature cited in Moss and Albery. Moreover, 6 recent studies consistently demonstrated that under circumstances in which executive control is impaired (either as a stable individual difference or under the acute influence of alcohol), associative processes, over and above expectancies, predict alcohol-related behavior. Taken together, the evidence strongly suggests a fundamental distinction between expectancies and associations in memory: Effects of propositional expectancies and executive functions are impaired under the acute influence of alcohol, but memory associations are not. This difference in perspective not only has theoretical implications but also leads to different predictions regarding acute alcohol effects in society.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bandura A. Reconstrual of “Free Will” from the Agentic Perspective of Social Cognitive Theory. In: Baer J, Kaufman JC, Baumeister RF, editors. Are we free? Psychology and Free Will. Oxford University Press; Oxford, UK: 2008. pp. 86–127.
    1. Bechara A, Noel X, Crone EA. Loss of willpower: Abnormal neural mechanisms of impulse control and decision making in addiction. In: Wiers RW, Stacy AW, editors. Handbook of Implicit Cognition and Addiction. SAGE Publishers; Thousand Oaks, CA: 2006. pp. 215–232.
    1. Berridge KC. Reward learning: Reinforcement, incentives, and expectations. In: Medin DL, editor. The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory. Vol. 40. Academic Press; San Diego, CA: 2001. pp. 223–278.
    1. Deutsch R, Gawronski B, Strack F. At the boundaries of automaticity: negation as reflective operation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2006;91:385–405. - PubMed
    1. Deutsch R, Strack F. Reflective and impulsive determinants of addictive behaviors. In: Wiers RW, Stacy AW, editors. Handbook of implicit cognition and addiction. Sage; Thousand Oaks, CA: 2006. pp. 45–57.

Publication types

Substances