A dual system model of preferences under risk
- PMID: 20063971
- DOI: 10.1037/a0017884
A dual system model of preferences under risk
Abstract
This article presents a dual system model (DSM) of decision making under risk and uncertainty according to which the value of a gamble is a combination of the values assigned to it independently by the affective and deliberative systems. On the basis of research on dual process theories and empirical research in Hsee and Rottenstreich (2004) and Rottenstreich and Hsee (2001) among others, the DSM incorporates (a) individual differences in disposition to rational versus emotional decision making, (b) the affective nature of outcomes, and (c) different task construals within its framework. The model has good descriptive validity and accounts for (a) violation of nontransparent stochastic dominance, (b) fourfold pattern of risk attitudes, (c) ambiguity aversion, (d) common consequence effect, (e) common ratio effect, (f) isolation effect, and (g) coalescing and event-splitting effects. The DSM is also used to make several novel predictions of conditions under which specific behavior patterns may or may not occur.
Similar articles
-
Affective and deliberative processes in risky choice: age differences in risk taking in the Columbia Card Task.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 May;35(3):709-30. doi: 10.1037/a0014983. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009. PMID: 19379045
-
Neural representation of subjective value under risk and ambiguity.J Neurophysiol. 2010 Feb;103(2):1036-47. doi: 10.1152/jn.00853.2009. Epub 2009 Dec 23. J Neurophysiol. 2010. PMID: 20032238
-
Application of a computational decision model to examine acute drug effects on human risk taking.Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 May;14(2):254-64. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.14.2.254. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006. PMID: 16756429
-
The neuronal substrate of risky choice: an insight into the contributions of neuroimaging to the understanding of theories on decision making under risk.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Apr;1128:41-52. doi: 10.1196/annals.1399.006. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008. PMID: 18469213 Review.
-
New paradoxes of risky decision making.Psychol Rev. 2008 Apr;115(2):463-501. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.463. Psychol Rev. 2008. PMID: 18426300 Review.
Cited by
-
Attention biases the process of risky decision-making: Evidence from eye-tracking.Psych J. 2024 Apr;13(2):157-165. doi: 10.1002/pchj.724. Epub 2023 Dec 28. Psych J. 2024. PMID: 38155408 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Emotion and decision-making: affect-driven belief systems in anxiety and depression.Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Sep;16(9):476-83. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.07.009. Epub 2012 Aug 13. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012. PMID: 22898207 Free PMC article. Review.
-
More intense experiences, less intense forecasts: why people overweight probability specifications in affective forecasts.J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Jan;106(1):20-36. doi: 10.1037/a0034478. Epub 2013 Oct 14. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014. PMID: 24128184 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
"What Did I Tell This Sad Person?": Memory for Emotional Destinations in Korsakoff's Syndrome.J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 28;12(5):1919. doi: 10.3390/jcm12051919. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 36902708 Free PMC article.
-
Sequential sampling and paradoxes of risky choice.Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Oct;21(5):1095-111. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0650-1. Epub 2014 Jun 5. Psychon Bull Rev. 2014. PMID: 24898202 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources